From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46328)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <berrange@redhat.com>) id 1Zf9QY-00068J-Ku
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:31:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <berrange@redhat.com>) id 1Zf9QU-0008R3-Gv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:31:22 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46966)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <berrange@redhat.com>) id 1Zf9QU-0008Qy-Bs
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Sep 2015 12:31:18 -0400
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:25:50 +0100
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20150924162550.GK31980@redhat.com>
References: <1443084128-25552-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1443084128-25552-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 00/10] vnc buffer handling
Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:41:58AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>   Hi,
> 
> Here is a patch series to improve the vnc buffer handling.  It picks up
> the qio_buffer patches from Daniel, adds move calls (move data from one
> buffer to another) and tracing, makes vnc use the new features.  Net
> effect should be that (a) vnc copies less data around and (b) buffers
> don't grow forever.
> 
> It's RfC because it depends on wip patches.  My plan is to wait for
> Daniels patch series to be merged (which should obsolete patches #1+#2),
> then rebase and repost the series.

I have a quick read through the patch series and it all looks pretty
good to me.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|