From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: lvivier@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
abologna@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
qemu-ppc@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/7] memory: Allow replay of IOMMU mapping notifications
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:30:33 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150929033033.GA19428@voom.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56090157.2000903@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1936 bytes --]
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 10:59:03AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 26/09/2015 08:54, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 02:04:14PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 25/09/2015 13:33, David Gibson wrote:
> >>> 1) Is there a case where using the no-replay functions makes
> >>> sense?
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure. I think vfio is the only user so far, so I
> >>> guess that's technically a no. I was reluctant to change the
> >>> interface and semantics just off the bat, though.
> >>
> >> Considering memory_region_listener does the reply, I think it's
> >> okay.
> >
> > Uh.. just to be clear, are you saying I should change this so
> > there's only the replaying interface?
>
> Maybe... The only issue is the "granularity" argument, which is
> not in memory_region_register_iommu_notifier. That makes me wonder if
> the replay and registration make sense as separate operations.
>
> What about adding a new function memory_region_iommu_replay and
> separate the two phases?
Hm.. I'm not sure I see much advantage to separating the phases. But
I don't particularly object to the idea either. So, I think it's your
call.
> >> For solving the problem that Laurent mentioned, using int128
> >> seems like the easiest solution...
> >
> > Maybe. It means I have to do all the address calculation in the
> > loop with an int128, then truncate it to do the actual call. That
> > seems harder to me than the overflow check I added, but I suppose
> > it's conceptually similar in some ways.
>
> Your overflow check is also okay, I wrote this before seeing the
> updated version.
>
> Paolo
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-29 3:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-24 4:33 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] VFIO extensions to allow VFIO devices on spapr-pci-host-bridge David Gibson
2015-09-24 4:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/7] vfio: Remove unneeded union from VFIOContainer David Gibson
2015-09-24 16:01 ` Alex Williamson
2015-09-25 5:14 ` David Gibson
2015-09-24 16:10 ` Thomas Huth
2015-09-24 4:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/7] vfio: Generalize vfio_listener_region_add failure path David Gibson
2015-09-24 4:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] vfio: Check guest IOVA ranges against host IOMMU capabilities David Gibson
2015-09-24 17:32 ` Alex Williamson
2015-09-25 5:20 ` David Gibson
2015-09-24 4:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/7] vfio: Record host IOMMU's available IO page sizes David Gibson
2015-09-24 17:32 ` Alex Williamson
2015-09-25 5:21 ` David Gibson
2015-09-24 4:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/7] memory: Allow replay of IOMMU mapping notifications David Gibson
2015-09-24 16:08 ` Laurent Vivier
2015-09-25 5:39 ` David Gibson
2015-09-24 17:32 ` Alex Williamson
2015-09-25 5:24 ` David Gibson
2015-09-25 11:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-25 11:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-25 11:33 ` David Gibson
2015-09-25 12:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-26 6:54 ` David Gibson
2015-09-28 8:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-29 3:30 ` David Gibson [this message]
2015-09-29 7:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-09-30 2:15 ` David Gibson
2015-09-24 4:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/7] vfio: Allow hotplug of containers onto existing guest IOMMU mappings David Gibson
2015-09-24 4:33 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/7] vfio: Expose a VFIO PCI device's group for EEH David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150929033033.GA19428@voom.redhat.com \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=abologna@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).