From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51258) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhD0i-0007RR-DK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:45:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhD0f-0004PN-76 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:45:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54195) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZhD0f-0004Nb-2n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 04:45:09 -0400 Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:45:03 +0100 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Message-ID: <20150930084503.GA19786@redhat.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] Add argument filters to the seccomp sandbox Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Namsun Ch'o Cc: pmoore@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, eduardo.otubo@profitbricks.com On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 04:40:42AM -0400, Namsun Ch'o wrote: > > This looks good now. > > Thanks for your contribution. > > > Acked-by: Eduardo Otubo > > > ps.: I'll create a pull request with all changes made so far on Friday. > > I was told on IRC to submit patches in smaller chunks, with a few new filters > at a time. Should I wait until it is merged, or should I go ahead and post a > v1 patch in a new thread against the patched qemu-seccomp.c now? There's no need to wait for things to be merged - feel free to post further patches based on the patch you already submitted. Just mention when posting them that they're a patch against your previous posting. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|