From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qobject: Replace property list with GHashTable
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:19:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151008101954.GH31017@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <018801d1003d$bd86fb00$3894f100$@samsung.com>
Nit-pick on subject line - s/qobject/qom/ and also copy
Andreas Färber on the patch, since he's the primary
maintainer of the QOM subsystem.
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 04:48:53PM +0300, Pavel Fedin wrote:
> ARM GICv3 systems with large number of CPUs create lots of IRQ pins. Since
> every pin is represented as a property, number of these properties becomes
> very large. Every property add first makes sure there's no duplicates.
> Traversing the list becomes very slow, therefore qemu initialization takes
> significant time (several seconds for e. g. 16 CPUs).
>
> This patch replaces list with GHashTable, making lookup very fast. The only
> drawback is that object_child_foreach() and object_child_foreach_recursive()
> cannot modify their objects during traversal, since GHashTableIter does not
> have modify-safe version. However, the code seems not to modify objects via
> these functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
> ---
> v1 => v2:
> - Fixed stupid bug in object_unparent(), use correct object
> ---
> include/qom/object.h | 4 +--
> qmp.c | 8 +++--
> qom/object.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> vl.c | 4 ++-
> 4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/qom/object.h b/include/qom/object.h
> index be7280c..b100923 100644
> --- a/include/qom/object.h
> +++ b/include/qom/object.h
> @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ typedef struct ObjectProperty
> ObjectPropertyRelease *release;
> void *opaque;
>
> - QTAILQ_ENTRY(ObjectProperty) node;
> + Object *obj;
I have a patch which adds property registration against the
class, so requiring ObjectProperty to have a back-poointer
to an object instance is not desirable.
> diff --git a/qom/object.c b/qom/object.c
> index 4805328..1c7c42a 100644
> --- a/qom/object.c
> +++ b/qom/object.c
> @@ -326,6 +326,20 @@ static void object_post_init_with_type(Object *obj, TypeImpl *ti)
> }
> }
>
> +static void property_destroy(gpointer data)
> +{
> + ObjectProperty *prop = data;
> +
> + if (prop->release) {
> + prop->release(prop->obj, prop->name, prop->opaque);
> + }
Instead of calling the release() callback here, use a hash iterator
to call it from the object_finalize() method, before unref'ing the
hash table, and also call it from objecT_property_del directly. That
way you don't need to store the Object * back pointer in the
ObjectProperty struct.
> +
> + g_free(prop->name);
> + g_free(prop->type);
> + g_free(prop->description);
> + g_free(prop);
> +}
> @@ -410,7 +404,7 @@ static void object_finalize(void *data)
> Object *obj = data;
> TypeImpl *ti = obj->class->type;
>
> - object_property_del_all(obj);
> + g_hash_table_unref(obj->properties);
> object_deinit(obj, ti);
>
> g_assert(obj->ref == 0);
> void object_property_del(Object *obj, const char *name, Error **errp)
> {
> - ObjectProperty *prop = object_property_find(obj, name, errp);
> - if (prop == NULL) {
> + if (g_hash_table_remove(obj->properties, name)) {
> return;
> }
>
> - if (prop->release) {
> - prop->release(obj, name, prop->opaque);
> - }
> -
> - QTAILQ_REMOVE(&obj->properties, prop, node);
> -
> - g_free(prop->name);
> - g_free(prop->type);
> - g_free(prop->description);
> - g_free(prop);
> + error_setg(errp, "Property '.%s' not found", name);
> }
Overall I think this is a good improvement to make
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-08 10:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-06 13:48 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qobject: Replace property list with GHashTable Pavel Fedin
2015-10-08 10:19 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151008101954.GH31017@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=p.fedin@samsung.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).