From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50604) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkNAa-0006DE-Hh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 22:12:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkNAQ-00071y-PF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 22:12:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:10:44 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20151009021044.GC19149@ad.nay.redhat.com> References: <1443705214-9304-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1443705214-9304-1-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/16] block: Get rid of bdrv_swap() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: berto@igalia.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com On Thu, 10/01 15:13, Kevin Wolf wrote: > bdrv_swap() has always been an ugly hack that we would rather have > avoided. When it was introduced, we simply didn't have the > infrastructure to update pointers instead of transplanting the contents > of BDS object, so we grudgingly added bdrv_swap() as a quick solution. > Meanwhile, most of the infrastructure exists and this series implements > the final step necessary to implement the required functionality in a > less adventurous way. Series, Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng