From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zlxbe-00035G-VI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 07:19:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zlxbe-0003iN-72 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 07:18:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 07:18:49 -0400 From: Jeff Cody Message-ID: <20151013111849.GB10945@localhost.localdomain> References: <221dd2d0a429089ed3876a61066b3b40f17368e1.1444691409.git.jcody@redhat.com> <87r3kzfc6e.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r3kzfc6e.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/4] qemu-iotests: update tests for generated node-names List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, berto@igalia.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, programmingkidx@gmail.com, jsnow@redhat.com On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:41:13AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Shouldn't PATCH 3+4 be squashed into PATCH 2 to keep bisection working? Yes, they should!