From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Matthias Lange <matthias.lange@kernkonzept.com>
Cc: imammedo@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
ehabkost@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] i386/acpi: add _HID to processor nodes
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 14:48:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151022144537-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445510291-8764-1-git-send-email-matthias.lange@kernkonzept.com>
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:38:11PM +0200, Matthias Lange wrote:
> Processor nodes created via the acpi/aml framework currently don't
> feature a _HID string. This patch appends "ACPI0007" as the _HID
> string to each processor node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Lange <matthias.lange@kernkonzept.com>
Indeed, it does that. But why?
ACPI0007 Processor Device. This device provides an alternative to
declaring processors using the
Processor ASL statement.
And “Declaring Processors” says
Each processor in the system must be declared in the ACPI namespace in
either the \_SB or \_PR
scope but not both. Declaration of processors in the \_PR scope is
required for platforms desiring
compatibility with ACPI 1.0-based OSPM implementations. Processors are
declared either via the
ASL Processor statement or the ASL Device statement. A Processor
definition declares a processor
object that provides processor configuration information and points to
the processor register block
(P_BLK). A Device definition for a processor is declared using the
ACPI0007 hardware identifier
(HID). In this case, processor configuration information is provided
exclusively by objects in the
processor device’s object list.
In other words, Processor directive does not need a HID.
In fact, ACPI 1.0 didn't include the ACPI0007 HID at all.
Please include this info in both the commit log and a code comment.
> ---
> hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index 95e0c65..95f7bf9 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -1153,6 +1153,7 @@ build_ssdt(GArray *table_data, GArray *linker,
> for (i = 0; i < acpi_cpus; i++) {
> dev = aml_processor(i, 0, 0, "CP%.02X", i);
>
> + aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_HID", aml_string("ACPI0007")));
> method = aml_method("_MAT", 0);
> aml_append(method, aml_return(aml_call1("CPMA", aml_int(i))));
> aml_append(dev, method);
> --
> 1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-22 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-22 10:38 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] i386/acpi: add _HID to processor nodes Matthias Lange
2015-10-22 11:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2015-10-22 12:42 ` Matthias Lange
2015-10-22 13:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-10-22 13:34 ` Matthias Lange
2015-10-22 13:43 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151022144537-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=matthias.lange@kernkonzept.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).