From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43281)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <drjones@redhat.com>) id 1Zr1sh-0005J1-B8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 06:53:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <drjones@redhat.com>) id 1Zr1se-0003Fj-1q
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 06:53:31 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42390)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <drjones@redhat.com>) id 1Zr1sd-0003FU-T5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 06:53:27 -0400
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:53:22 +0100
From: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20151027105322.GA16832@hawk.localdomain>
References: <CAFEAcA-s_hSQiLCkQDeX2rR12PcPx5yZ885yZy7C=ZWA5DDbTw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA-s_hSQiLCkQDeX2rR12PcPx5yZ885yZy7C=ZWA5DDbTw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] proposal: new qemu-arm mailing list
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>, Peter Crosthwaite <crosthwaitepeter@gmail.com>, Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 10:15:32AM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Hi; it's been suggested to me that it would be helpful to have a
> qemu-arm mailing list, along the lines of the existing qemu-ppc
> and qemu-block lists. The idea would be to get people to cc the
> list with their ARM related patches, so it would mostly act as
> a way for people to filter their mail to separate the ARM stuff
> out from the qemu-devel firehose. (Everything should still be
> cc'd to qemu-devel as well.)
> 
> Any objections/opinions?

FWIW, I like the idea. Although

notmuch tag +qemu-arm -- tag:new \
                         and to:qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
                         and \( subject:arm or subject:aarch64 \)

also seems to work pretty well for me.

Thanks,
drew