Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/13] Mac OS 9 compatibility improvements (upstream rework)

[David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5867 bytes --]

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 06:29:09AM +0000, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On 11/11/15 02:11, David Gibson wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 11:32:02PM +0000, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> >> On 04/11/15 03:44, David Gibson wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 04:48:12PM +0000, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> >>>> On 23/10/15 14:56, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> This is a rework of Cormac O'Brien's GSoC project to try and boot MacOS 9 under
> >>>>> QEMU, the original version of which was posted to the qemu-devel list at the
> >>>>> end of August (https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-08/msg02521.html).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The patchset consisted of some simple patches from Alex and then a large set of
> >>>>> CUDA changes supplied as a single patch which were the result of Cormac analysing
> >>>>> MOL with Alex's help to try and further the boot process.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> In their previous form, the patches were unsuitable for applying upstream since
> >>>>> while they furthered MacOS 9 boot, they also caused a couple of major regressions
> >>>>> such as breaking the mouse and causing Darwin/OS X boot to panic on startup.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This reworked patchset fixes these regressions, includes some other clean-ups 
> >>>>> and more importantly now passes all of my OpenBIOS image boot tests with an 
> >>>>> OpenBIOS binary from SVN trunk (separate pull request to be sent shortly).
> >>>>> Whilst OpenBIOS still needs one additional patch to run the MacOS 9 bootloader,
> >>>>> I've uploaded a pre-compiled binary to 
> >>>>> https://www.ilande.co.uk/tmp/openbios-ppc for people interested in testing the 
> >>>>> new MacOS 9 functionality.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Apologies for the delay in sending this out on-list, however due to recent
> >>>>> circumstances I've been without a reliable broadband connection for a couple
> >>>>> of weeks. However given that this is mostly a rework of the previous patchset 
> >>>>> and looks good in testing here, I'd definitely like it to be considered for
> >>>>> application during soft freeze.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Alexander Graf (3):
> >>>>>   PPC: Allow Rc bit to be set on mtspr
> >>>>>   PPC: Fix lsxw bounds checks
> >>>>>   PPC: mac99: Always add USB controller
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mark Cave-Ayland (10):
> >>>>>   cuda.c: fix CUDA ADB error packet format
> >>>>>   cuda.c: fix CUDA_PACKET response packet format
> >>>>>   cuda.c: implement simple CUDA_GET_6805_ADDR command
> >>>>>   cuda.c: implement dummy IIC access commands
> >>>>>   cuda.c: fix CUDA SR interrupt clearing
> >>>>>   cuda.c: add defines for CUDA registers
> >>>>>   cuda.c: refactor get_tb() so that the time can be passed in
> >>>>>   cuda.c: rename get_counter() state variable from s to ti for
> >>>>>     consistency
> >>>>>   cuda.c: fix T2 timer and enable its interrupt
> >>>>>   cuda.c: add delay to setting of SR_INT bit
> >>>>>
> >>>>>  hw/misc/macio/cuda.c    |  243 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >>>>>  hw/ppc/mac.h            |    3 +
> >>>>>  hw/ppc/mac_newworld.c   |    3 +-
> >>>>>  target-ppc/mem_helper.c |    5 +-
> >>>>>  target-ppc/translate.c  |    2 +-
> >>>>>  5 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> Ping? Can anyone review this in Alex's absence? In the meantime I've
> >>>> added it to wiki at http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/2.5 as it would be
> >>>> good to get the GSoC work upstream for 2.5.
> >>>
> >>> Sorry I've taken a while to get to this.  It looks pretty good, though
> >>> I've sent a handful of comments on individual patches.
> >>>
> >>> I gathered from one of your replies that you do intend to do a
> >>> respin.  The current comments all look pretty trivial, so I expect
> >>> I'll be ok to apply your respin to ppc-next (which I'm looking after
> >>> in agraf's absence).  It would be nice to get a review from someone
> >>> more familiar with, or better able to test MacOS stuff.
> >>
> >> Great. I've sent a further few replies, so if you're happy with the
> >> answers let me know and I'll send a v2 tomorrow.
> > 
> > Haven't seen v2.  Did something sidetrack you, or did I manage to miss
> > it?
> 
> Hi David,
> 
> I am still waiting for feedback (and Reviewed-by tags) for a few replies
> to your initial patch review:
> 
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-11/msg00855.html
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-11/msg00856.html
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-11/msg00862.html

Sorry, I managed to miss these.  The first two replies seem good, I'll
send a few comments on the third now.

> In particular would you like me to add the comments about MOL to the
> commit messages?

But yes, referencing MOL in the messages would be good so we can see
where this came from in the future.

> And I wasn't sure from your comments whether you were
> still looking for someone else more able to test the MacOS stuff?

Well, that would be nice, but in the absence of any volunteers, I'll
take the series anyway (provided I don't spot breakage of other
platforms, obviously).

> That said, if you're happy with my responses I can respin later today if
> you are able to send a pull request before tomorrow (which is when
> freeze hits)? I have enough free time over the next couple of weeks to
> handle any issues that may arise, although I'm fairly confident in these
> patches as I've been running them locally over my OpenBIOS test images
> for a few weeks now.
> 
> 
> ATB,
> 
> Mark.
> 

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]