From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
vsementsov@virtuozzo.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 2.6 2/3] block: Hide HBitmap in block dirty bitmap interface
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 10:28:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151124022814.GA26733@ad.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5653866A.2080003@redhat.com>
On Mon, 11/23 16:34, John Snow wrote:
> Hmm, what's the idea, here?
>
> This patch does a lot more than just hide hbitmap details from callers
> of block_dirty_bitmap functions.
>
> So we're changing the backing hbitmap to always be one where g=0 and the
> number of physical bits directly is (now) the same as the number of
> 'virtual' bits, pre-patch. Then, to compensate, we handle the shift math
> to convert the bitmap granularity to sector size and vice-versa in the
> Block Dirty Bitmap layer instead of in the hbitmap layer.
>
> What's the benefit? It looks like we just pull all the implementation
> details up from hbitmap and into BdrvDirtyBitmap, which I am not
> immediately convinced of as being a benefit.
It feels counter intuitive to me with hbitmap handling granularity, it makes it
more like a HGranularityBitmap rather than HBitmap, and is unnecessarily
complex to work on.
Now it's simplified in that only one BdrvDirtyBitmap needs to care about the
granularity, and which I think is a big benefit when we are going to extend the
dirty bitmap interface, for example to serialize and deserialize for
persistence.
Fam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-24 2:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-20 9:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 2.6 0/3] Bitmap clean-up patches for 2.6 Fam Zheng
2015-11-20 9:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 2.6 1/3] backup: Use Bitmap to replace "s->bitmap" Fam Zheng
2015-11-20 15:53 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2015-11-23 6:42 ` Fam Zheng
2015-11-23 9:01 ` Wen Congyang
2015-11-23 9:19 ` Fam Zheng
2015-11-23 9:24 ` Wen Congyang
2015-11-23 9:55 ` Fam Zheng
2015-11-23 9:58 ` Wen Congyang
2015-11-23 14:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-23 21:00 ` John Snow
2015-11-20 9:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 2.6 2/3] block: Hide HBitmap in block dirty bitmap interface Fam Zheng
2015-11-20 16:08 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2015-11-23 6:44 ` Fam Zheng
2015-11-23 21:34 ` John Snow
2015-11-24 2:28 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2015-11-24 9:12 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2015-11-25 2:49 ` Fam Zheng
2015-11-24 19:19 ` John Snow
2015-11-20 9:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 2.6 3/3] hbitmap: Drop "granularity" Fam Zheng
2015-11-20 16:22 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2015-11-23 6:46 ` Fam Zheng
2015-11-20 16:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 2.6 0/3] Bitmap clean-up patches for 2.6 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151124022814.GA26733@ad.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).