Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] tests: add file-write-read test

[Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

Quoting Eric Blake (2015-11-25 10:02:55)
> On 11/25/2015 05:59 AM, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
> > 
> > This test exhibits a POSIX behaviour regarding switching between write
> > and read. It's undefined result if the application doesn't ensure a
> > flush between the two operations (with glibc, the flush can be implicit
> > when the buffer size is relatively small). The previous commit fixes
> > this test.
> > 
> > Related to:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210246
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/test-qga.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> 
> > +    /* seek to 0 */
> > +    cmd = g_strdup_printf("{'execute': 'guest-file-seek',"
> > +                          " 'arguments': { 'handle': %" PRId64 ", "
> > +                          " 'offset': %d, 'whence': %d } }",
> > +                          id, 0, SEEK_SET);
> 
> We still have a conflict between this series and my proposal to codify 0
> rather than relying on platform-specific SEEK_SET; Markus had the
> suggestion of using QGA_SET (or QGA_SEEK_SET).  Are we trying to get
> both your series and my v2 patch into 2.5?  Knowing that will help me
> decide whether my v2 should be rebased on top of your patches.

I was planning on pulling in your patch on top of this for the next
2.5 pull, so rebasing on top of this series is probably best.

> 
> -- 
> Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
> Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
>