From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45974) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3kbG-0006QF-UT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 08:04:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3kbB-0004CK-Cy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 08:04:06 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54088) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3kbB-0004CG-7f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 08:04:01 -0500 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5AFFC802 for ; Tue, 1 Dec 2015 13:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 21:03:45 +0800 From: Peter Xu Message-ID: <20151201130342.GC31109@pxdev.xzpeter.org> References: <1448883140-20249-1-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> <1448883140-20249-11-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> <565C478A.8080106@redhat.com> <20151201035755.GI21032@pxdev.xzpeter.org> <565D6E68.1060303@redhat.com> <20151201123250.GA31109@pxdev.xzpeter.org> <565D9491.5000909@redhat.com> <20151201124545.GB31109@pxdev.xzpeter.org> <565D96CC.6020304@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <565D96CC.6020304@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/12] Dump: add qmp command "query-dump" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: drjones@redhat.com, lersek@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, famz@redhat.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 01:47:08PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 01/12/2015 13:45, Peter Xu wrote: > >> > It's a matter of taste though. What you wrote above is certainly okay > >> > as well. > > Thanks for the explanation. Then I will choose smp_*() this time and > > post v4 later. > > In that case, remember to add a comment before each smp_*(), similar to > the one in thread-pool.c. Ok. Thanks. Peter > > Paolo