From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40128) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a44rW-0007k2-5b for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 05:42:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a44rV-0007bY-AH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 05:42:14 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51301) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a44rV-0007bS-5r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 05:42:13 -0500 Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:11:55 +0530 From: Amit Shah Message-ID: <20151202104155.GB16990@grmbl.mre> References: <20151124045825.GB8335@grmbl.mre> <20151201121605.GD27993@grmbl.mre> <565DCE9B.1040502@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <565DCE9B.1040502@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Highlighting changes in QEMU 2.5 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: John Snow Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, mst@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com, mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk, qemu list , agraf@suse.de, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, kraxel@redhat.com, dgibson@redhat.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, berto@igalia.com, quintela@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, sw@weilnetz.de, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com, leon.alrae@imgtec.com, jasowang@redhat.com, lvivier@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com, ehabkost@redhat.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, mjt@tls.msk.ru, riku.voipio@iki.fi, alex.williamson@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, rth@twiddle.net, kwolf@redhat.com, kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de, mreitz@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de, aurelien@aurel32.net On (Tue) 01 Dec 2015 [11:45:15], John Snow wrote: > > > On 12/01/2015 07:16 AM, Amit Shah wrote: > > Ping. > > > > I haven't received any responses so far, please let me know if you're > > planning on doing this. > > > > Thanks, > > > > I did amend the changelog on the wiki for my part, but I don't have > anything better than a webcam. I have hunches that hewn together grainy > webcam footage won't make for a very compelling video... Last time I just used my cellphone camera at the KVM Forum, and the result was good enough - so you could try that too. Content is more important :) Amit