From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52238)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1a46l2-0003vM-S3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 07:43:41 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1a46l1-00083W-QN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 07:43:40 -0500
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:43:32 +0100
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20151202124332.GA4661@noname.redhat.com>
References: <1449011799-2790-1-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1449011799-2790-1-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.6 0/3] iotests: 124: Don't reopen
	qcow2 file
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org

Am 02.12.2015 um 00:16 hat John Snow geschrieben:
> Kevin caught me being Naughty, and because I don't want Santa to be
> mad at me, I have corrected my ways.
> 
> Split iotest 124 into two classes so that the iotest that requires
> a blkdebug filter from the get-go can forego the standard setUp
> routine and just do it correct the first time.
> 
> Does this warrant three patches? Not really, but to make the code
> motion nice to look at, I had to split it out that way.

Thanks, applied to block-next.

Kevin