From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC for-2.6 0/3] block: Add meta dirty bitmap for migration/persistence
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:42:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151208014256.GD7567@ad.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56659561.4070709@virtuozzo.com>
On Mon, 12/07 17:19, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On 07.12.2015 08:59, Fam Zheng wrote:
> >Vladimir,
> >
> >This is what I propose to implement meta bitmap. It's implemented in the
> >HBitmap level to be more efficient, and the interface slightly varies too.
>
> What is the benefit?
>
> Hbitmap usage:
>
> 1) BdrvDirtyBitmap - need meta
> 2) BackupBlockJob - doesn't need meta
> 3) BlockDirtyBitmapState - doesn't need meta
> 4) now I'm working on series for parallels format and I use HBitmap
> to mark allocated/free clusters.. - doesn't need meta
> 5) your meta hbitmap =) - doesn't need meta..
6) persistence dirty bitmap. - need meta
>
> So, what is the benefit of moving this functionality to parent
> class? (Which is complicated without it)..
See my reply to John's comment on the cover letter. This is more efficient than
doing it in BdrvDirtyBitmap.
>
> However, I'm not really against, except my comment to the first patch.
>
> PS:
> Actually I don't like HBitmap - BdrvDirtyBitmap..
> - No implementation without granularity
> I need HBitmap without granularity for my needs and have to
> use granularity=0. If there was HBitmap without granularity some
> operations can be faster - for example, finding next/previous/last
> zeros, jumping by words not by bits..
> - It is not sparse. Empty bitmap occupies lots of ram.
> - different granularity units for HBitmap and BdrvDirtyBitmap
> - different layers with/without granularity in hbitmap.c
> - HBitmap with non-zero granularity doesn't know its size (only
> rounded up to granularity)
> - necessity of writing wrappers like
> bdrv_dirty_bitmap_do_something(...)
> {
> hbitmap_do_something(...)
> }
> -- Yes, I understand that this is inevitably, but I just don't like it..
> - BdrvDirtyBitmap is defined in block.c.. I think, it should have
> its own .c file.
Yes, I agree we should cut it out during 2.6, with a separate header.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-08 1:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-07 5:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC for-2.6 0/3] block: Add meta dirty bitmap for migration/persistence Fam Zheng
2015-12-07 5:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC for-2.6 1/3] HBitmap: Introduce "meta" bitmap to track bit changes Fam Zheng
2015-12-07 13:32 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2015-12-08 1:31 ` Fam Zheng
2015-12-09 11:51 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2015-12-30 10:53 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2015-12-30 11:07 ` Fam Zheng
2015-12-30 11:26 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-01-21 10:58 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-01-22 3:10 ` Fam Zheng
2015-12-07 5:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC for-2.6 2/3] tests: Add test code for meta bitmap Fam Zheng
2015-12-07 5:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC for-2.6 3/3] block: Support meta dirty bitmap Fam Zheng
2015-12-07 14:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC for-2.6 0/3] block: Add meta dirty bitmap for migration/persistence Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2015-12-08 1:42 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2015-12-09 11:46 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2015-12-07 23:47 ` John Snow
2015-12-08 1:36 ` Fam Zheng
2015-12-09 11:57 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151208014256.GD7567@ad.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).