qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC for-2.6 0/3] block: Add meta dirty bitmap for migration/persistence
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 09:42:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151208014256.GD7567@ad.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56659561.4070709@virtuozzo.com>

On Mon, 12/07 17:19, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> On 07.12.2015 08:59, Fam Zheng wrote:
> >Vladimir,
> >
> >This is what I propose to implement meta bitmap. It's implemented in the
> >HBitmap level to be more efficient, and the interface slightly varies too.
> 
> What is the benefit?
> 
> Hbitmap usage:
> 
> 1) BdrvDirtyBitmap - need meta
> 2) BackupBlockJob - doesn't need meta
> 3) BlockDirtyBitmapState - doesn't need meta
> 4) now I'm working on series for parallels format and I use HBitmap
> to mark allocated/free clusters.. - doesn't need meta
> 5) your meta hbitmap =) - doesn't need meta..

6) persistence dirty bitmap. - need meta

> 
> So, what is the benefit of moving this functionality to parent
> class? (Which is complicated without it)..

See my reply to John's comment on the cover letter. This is more efficient than
doing it in BdrvDirtyBitmap.

> 
> However, I'm not really against, except my comment to the first patch.
> 
> PS:
> Actually I don't like HBitmap - BdrvDirtyBitmap..
> - No implementation without granularity
>        I need HBitmap without granularity for my needs and have to
> use granularity=0. If there was HBitmap without granularity some
> operations can be faster - for example, finding next/previous/last
> zeros, jumping by words not by bits..
> - It is not sparse. Empty bitmap occupies lots of ram.
> - different granularity units for HBitmap and BdrvDirtyBitmap
> - different layers with/without granularity in hbitmap.c
> - HBitmap with non-zero granularity doesn't know its size (only
> rounded up to granularity)
> - necessity of writing wrappers like
>    bdrv_dirty_bitmap_do_something(...)
>    {
>         hbitmap_do_something(...)
>    }
>    -- Yes, I understand that this is inevitably, but I just don't like it..
> - BdrvDirtyBitmap is defined in block.c.. I think, it should have
> its own .c file.

Yes, I agree we should cut it out during 2.6, with a separate header.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-08  1:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-07  5:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC for-2.6 0/3] block: Add meta dirty bitmap for migration/persistence Fam Zheng
2015-12-07  5:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC for-2.6 1/3] HBitmap: Introduce "meta" bitmap to track bit changes Fam Zheng
2015-12-07 13:32   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2015-12-08  1:31     ` Fam Zheng
2015-12-09 11:51       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2015-12-30 10:53   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2015-12-30 11:07     ` Fam Zheng
2015-12-30 11:26       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-01-21 10:58       ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2016-01-22  3:10         ` Fam Zheng
2015-12-07  5:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC for-2.6 2/3] tests: Add test code for meta bitmap Fam Zheng
2015-12-07  5:59 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC for-2.6 3/3] block: Support meta dirty bitmap Fam Zheng
2015-12-07 14:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC for-2.6 0/3] block: Add meta dirty bitmap for migration/persistence Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2015-12-08  1:42   ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2015-12-09 11:46     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2015-12-07 23:47 ` John Snow
2015-12-08  1:36   ` Fam Zheng
2015-12-09 11:57     ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151208014256.GD7567@ad.usersys.redhat.com \
    --to=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).