qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qom: change object property iterator API contract
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 12:29:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151209122909.GC19914@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5666FFE0.10703@redhat.com>

On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:05:52AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 11/27/2015 08:27 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Currently the object property iterator API works as follows
> > 
> >   ObjectPropertyIterator *iter;
> > 
> >   iter = object_property_iter_init(obj);
> >   while ((prop = object_property_iter_next(iter))) {
> >      ...
> >   }
> >   object_property_iter_free(iter);
> > 
> > This has the benefit that the ObjectPropertyIterator struct
> > can be opaque, but has the downside that callers need to
> > explicitly call a free function. It is also not in keeping
> > with iterator style used elsewhere in QEMU/glib2
> > 
> > This patch changes the API to use stack allocation instead
> > 
> >   ObjectPropertyIterator iter;
> > 
> >   object_property_iter_init(&iter, obj);
> >   while ((prop = object_property_iter_next(&iter))) {
> >      ...
> >   }
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > NB, this patch is not against master, it is intended to apply
> > after
> > 
> >   "qom: allow properties to be registered against classes"
> > 
> > which is queued in qom-next for 2.6
> > 
> >  hw/ppc/spapr_drc.c         |  7 +++----
> >  include/qom/object.h       | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >  net/filter.c               |  7 +++----
> >  qmp.c                      | 14 ++++++--------
> >  qom/object.c               | 22 ++++------------------
> >  tests/check-qom-proplist.c |  7 +++----
> >  vl.c                       |  7 +++----
> >  7 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> > +++ b/include/qom/object.h
> > @@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ typedef struct ObjectProperty
> >      void *opaque;
> >  } ObjectProperty;
> >  
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * ObjectUnparent:
> >   * @obj: the object that is being removed from the composition tree
> 
> Spurious whitespace change?
> 
> 
> >  
> > + /**
> > + * object_property_iter_free:
> > + * @iter: the iterator instance
> > + *
> > + * Releases any resources associated with the iterator. It is
> > + * not necessary to call this method if object_property_iter_next
> > + * has returned %NULL. It is only required if an application wishes
> > + * to abort iteration before it is complete
> > + */
> > +void object_property_iter_free(ObjectPropertyIterator *iter);
> > +
> 
> Huh? Why is this being added?  I thought the point was to get rid of the
> need for object_property_iter_free().

Yeh, forgot to remove the header declaration.

> 
> > +++ b/qom/object.c
> > @@ -67,11 +67,6 @@ struct TypeImpl
> 
> Other than that snafu, everything else looked fine.   If that's all you
> fix for v2, you can add:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

Ok, thanks for the review


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

      reply	other threads:[~2015-12-09 12:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-27 15:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qom: change object property iterator API contract Daniel P. Berrange
2015-12-08 16:05 ` Eric Blake
2015-12-09 12:29   ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151209122909.GC19914@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).