From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34931) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7P6w-00014A-Gt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:55:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7P6t-0002mB-C2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:55:54 -0500 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:65533) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7P6t-0002m5-5q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 09:55:51 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 15:55:47 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault Message-ID: <20151211145547.GA4029@var.bordeaux.inria.fr> References: <20151211001505.GV2905@var.home> <1449792930-27293-1-git-send-email-samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> <1449792930-27293-2-git-send-email-samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> <566AD1E4.1050403@redhat.com> <566AD30E.2060002@redhat.com> <566AD45C.20000@redhat.com> <20151211140124.GE2927@var.bordeaux.inria.fr> <566ADE90.3070303@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <566ADE90.3070303@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/18] slirp: Generalizing and neutralizing code before adding IPv6 stuff List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: zhanghailiang , Li Zhijian , Stefan Hajnoczi , Jason Wang , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Vasiliy Tolstov , Dave Gilbert , Gonglei , Jan Kiszka , Huangpeng , Guillaume Subiron Thomas Huth, on Fri 11 Dec 2015 15:32:48 +0100, wrote: > So maybe it's better to do smaller steps instead: Would it for example > make sense to split the whole series into two parts - first a series > that does all the preparation and cleanup patches. And then once that > has been reviewed and merged, send the second series that adds the real > new IPv6 code. Ok, that's what we already have: patches 1-9 are refactoring and support, and 10-18 are ipv6 code. Samuel