From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48851)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>) id 1a7Ppc-0000d0-G5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:42:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>) id 1a7PpZ-00087v-7x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:42:04 -0500
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:11737)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>) id 1a7PpY-000876-Sv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2015 10:42:01 -0500
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 16:41:59 +0100
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
Message-ID: <20151211154159.GF4029@var.bordeaux.inria.fr>
References: <1449792930-27293-1-git-send-email-samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
	<1449792930-27293-2-git-send-email-samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
	<566AD1E4.1050403@redhat.com> <566AD30E.2060002@redhat.com>
	<566AD45C.20000@redhat.com>
	<20151211140124.GE2927@var.bordeaux.inria.fr>
	<566ADE90.3070303@redhat.com>
	<20151211145547.GA4029@var.bordeaux.inria.fr>
	<566AE733.4040408@redhat.com> <566AEE70.6060600@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <566AEE70.6060600@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/18] slirp: Generalizing and neutralizing
 code before adding IPv6 stuff
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, zhanghailiang <zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com>, Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Vasiliy Tolstov <v.tolstov@selfip.ru>, Dave Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>, Gonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>, Huangpeng <peter.huangpeng@huawei.com>, Guillaume Subiron <maethor@subiron.org>

Laszlo Ersek, on Fri 11 Dec 2015 16:40:32 +0100, wrote:
> > Sounds good, ... then I'd suggest to sent the preparation patches
> > separately next time and get them accepted first.
> 
> And then the next reviewer will say, "nice, but it would be even nicer
> to see what *motivates* these preparatory patches!" :)

Yes, I also had that in mind, just didn't say it :)

Samuel