From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54879) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9wLj-0006g1-LE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:49:40 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9wLg-00005U-EK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:49:39 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51500) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a9wLg-0008WQ-8j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:49:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 14:49:31 +0000 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Message-ID: <20151218144931.GD7228@redhat.com> References: <1450438575-21613-1-git-send-email-berrange@redhat.com> <5673FDB0.6040900@redhat.com> <20151218130555.GB7228@redhat.com> <56740537.9010106@redhat.com> <20151218133513.GD2459@work-vm> <56740CF5.302@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] scripts: provide a script for checking glib symbol usage Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Paolo Bonzini , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , =?utf-8?Q?Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= Lureau , QEMU Developers On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 01:43:19PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 18 December 2015 at 13:41, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > > > > On 18/12/2015 14:35, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > >> > That would not be recursive make, but rather a completely separate > >> > Makefile to be manually invoked with -f. > >> > >> Hmm but wouldn't this Makefile also be a good place for small-fast > >> style check scripts that could be included in make check ? > > > > Yes, but there is no benefit from inclusion, since these tests do not > > depend on anything having been built already. > > In particular, if it doesn't require a preceding configure or > build I can just run it once as part of my merge testing rather > than farming it out to be run in parallel on five machines and > ten different configs :-) Ok, yeah, that makes total sense - it certainly shouldn't depend on any configure / build step. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|