From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] block: fix inability to start VM with native AIO
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 16:07:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151223080701.GE5149@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450767586-28794-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2550 bytes --]
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 09:59:46AM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> error: Failed to start domain rhel7
> error: internal error: process exited while connecting to monitor:
> 2015-12-22T06:55:18.812637Z qemu-system-x86_64:
> -drive file=/var/lib/libvirt/images/rhel7.qcow2,if=none,
> id=drive-scsi0-0-0-0,format=qcow2,cache=none,aio=native:
> aio=native was specified, but it requires cache.direct=on,
> which was not specified.
>
> cache=none option was specified as seen above while the VM is unable to
> start. The patch properly passed BDRV_O_NOCACHE to underlying layer.
>
> The problem is revealed with
> commit d657c0c289e944fc22289f5c318f48da87d79dcb
> Author: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> Date: Tue Dec 15 11:35:36 2015 +0100
>
> raw-posix: Make aio=native option binding
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
> CC: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> ---
> block.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
> index 411edbf..fe0fbbc 100644
> --- a/block.c
> +++ b/block.c
> @@ -990,6 +990,7 @@ static int bdrv_open_common(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *file,
> bs->opaque = g_malloc0(drv->instance_size);
>
> /* Apply cache mode options */
> + update_flags_from_options(&open_flags, opts);
> update_flags_from_options(&bs->open_flags, opts);
> bdrv_set_enable_write_cache(bs, bs->open_flags & BDRV_O_CACHE_WB);
I tried to review this patch and failed to understand block.c flags
handling. Perhaps there is a larger problem here because I see:
1. .bdrv_open() and friends take an int flags argument in addition to
the already open bs node, which has bs->open_flags. Some of the code
that manipulates the flags argument in block.c updates bs->open_flags
to keep them in sync. Some code does not (e.g. BDRV_O_NO_BACKING).
Is this a bug?
Should int flags be removed in favor of just bs->open_flags?
2. The bdrv_open_common() open_flags local variable contains different
values from bs->open_flags (i.e. BDRV_O_PROTOCOL). I'm not sure
whether this is intentional or a bug.
Your patch syncs them but I wonder if it would be cleaner to remove
the open_flags local (avoiding similar problems in the future)?
3. block/qcow2.c stashes .bdrv_open(flags) in s->flags. I'm not sure
if bs->open_flags can be used instead of s->flags. That would be
simpler.
Maybe someone can explain how this is all supposed to work.
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-23 8:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-22 6:59 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] block: fix inability to start VM with native AIO Denis V. Lunev
2015-12-23 8:07 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2015-12-23 8:08 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-01-08 12:25 ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-01-11 13:46 ` Christian Borntraeger
2016-01-11 14:26 ` Denis V. Lunev
2016-02-08 14:49 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151223080701.GE5149@stefanha-x1.localdomain \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).