qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
	Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] blockdev: Error out on negative throttling option values
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 19:02:00 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160113110200.GF25517@ad.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <w51a8o9iy18.fsf@maestria.local.igalia.com>

On Wed, 01/13 11:17, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Wed 13 Jan 2016 01:52:29 AM CET, Fam Zheng wrote:
> 
> > The implicit casting from unsigned int to double changes negative values
> > into large positive numbers and accepts them.  We should instead print
> > an error.
> >
> > Check the number range so this case is catched and reported.
> 
> I still don't know why qemu_opt_get_number() convert silently negative
> numbers into positive ones, shouldn't it just fail with an "invalid
> parameter" error?

Because the parsing is done with strtoull(3) and unfortunately its man page
says "negative values are considered valid input and are silently converted to
the equivalent unsigned long int value."

> 
> > +#define THROTTLE_VALUE_MAX 1000000000000000L
> 
> This is larger than LONG_MAX in 32-bit systems, I don't know if you need
> to use LL instead.

I assume a compiler will handle that okay but yes it's safer to use LL.

Fam

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-13 11:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-13  0:52 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] block: Reject negative values for throttling options Fam Zheng
2016-01-13  0:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] blockdev: Error out on negative throttling option values Fam Zheng
2016-01-13 10:17   ` Alberto Garcia
2016-01-13 11:02     ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2016-01-13 11:13       ` Alberto Garcia
2016-01-14  3:14         ` Fam Zheng
2016-01-14  3:21     ` Eric Blake
2016-01-13  0:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] iotests: Test that negative throttle values are rejected Fam Zheng
2016-01-13 10:02   ` Alberto Garcia
2016-01-14  3:17     ` Fam Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160113110200.GF25517@ad.usersys.redhat.com \
    --to=famz@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=berto@igalia.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).