From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33978) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLPYY-0005sd-Ir for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:14:19 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLPYV-0008AW-DA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:14:18 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:56710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aLPYV-0008A0-2u for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Jan 2016 01:14:15 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:15:05 +1100 From: David Gibson Message-ID: <20160119061505.GC27454@voom.redhat.com> References: <1452854709-12855-1-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1452854709-12855-1-git-send-email-alex.bennee@linaro.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] .travis.yml: migrate to container builds List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org --zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 10:45:09AM +0000, Alex Benn=E9e wrote: > This moves the Travis tests from their old legacy VM > infrastructure (which only seems to run 5-6 jobs at once) to their new > container based approach. >=20 > The principle difference is there is no sudo in the containers so all > packages are installed using the apt add-on. This means one of the build > combinations can be dropped as it was only for checking the build with > additional packages. >=20 > I've disabled the user-space tracing build until the dependant packages > go through the Travis package white-listing process. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Alex Benn=E9e Tested-by: David Gibson Is it safe to just drop that build combination, or should we instead be doing something else to test the build _without_ those extra packages? [snip] > @@ -86,10 +103,10 @@ matrix: > - env: TARGETS=3Di386-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu > EXTRA_CONFIG=3D"--enable-trace-backends=3Dftrace" > compiler: gcc > - - env: TARGETS=3Di386-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu > - EXTRA_PKGS=3D"liblttng-ust-dev liburcu-dev" > - EXTRA_CONFIG=3D"--enable-trace-backends=3Dust" > - compiler: gcc > + # UST backend disabled until liblttng-ust-dev pkg white-listed > + #- env: TARGETS=3Di386-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu > + # EXTRA_CONFIG=3D"--enable-trace-backends=3Dust" > + # compiler: gcc This comment is a bit confusing to me, since the apt addon package list already seems to include liblttng-ust-dev. > - env: TARGETS=3Di386-softmmu,x86_64-softmmu > EXTRA_CONFIG=3D"--enable-modules" > compiler: gcc --=20 David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson --zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWndRpAAoJEGw4ysog2bOSTIEP/jMEZaPrECzoWi/4YhLSAlEt /LnEdWZFIRipLUz+ncQjDrMkeQNzPhk5L3pykPs6OUhLpefLCl4rQjKKv5mQqhUu IrSzZ/EkFYcQ0asukvTrOlplBbwm0IrYmWDINI834wnbgS+U5cdAc7nc08xW1xm7 SKemDl5VIyqU+WqQfc7/j+YErjkk4llebJaXAUU7ck83v/y7yKKEdHAFgc1hdyDW lr9QXtEjfIgo0xbsOTZaEDcHGook3mogxaYx/TlqFdF3QQGhTbyTf5hF7n7rFpvQ U4gCzXv3gt33TyjsCMXTvweA1gn3Uh8zezRgLS7XHBzcRmXJuK1qbMZZOPRGO/W3 QJJaUuQfDyV6jeOzi5SeRNjvXp+i39+KGc0TDPUJrE8CeX62uvK2TLlcMv4YIovc FoPMOkONFaF0vOhoi0o/ESgZTzL9K9tLuXQ/5sB/F6+rEW9HP2D/NPzmLj1AsZNi QGuMlZXIN1rC7yzgxmq5lN3JqDTTz9jn5S1ocs3y9NTpgfxUD0ltIZEXl/OcE5Gg KtV7hztBPdEba0kDZYsQCGpJtoJctD4G6H7LSN9Rs2WZeqVtIjtoGxkAUU1hHDPn 78dsf9bf4XjzIrLW26qVxQgZCfxt+3mbH+jQuNxRaBDWSGq+TgTGqnKC4QESMY6g /QCGQVJsD5wPx2MVy+Ti =LkOw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA--