* [Qemu-devel] crash with -incoming and -snapshot @ 2016-02-14 15:52 Paolo Bonzini 2016-02-14 16:12 ` Paolo Bonzini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2016-02-14 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel Reproducer: x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 \ -incoming tcp:localhost:12345 -snapshot \ /vm/virt_test/images/jeos-21-64-base.qcow2 Weird as it may seem, this actually makes some sense for testing migration with non-shared storage... Paolo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] crash with -incoming and -snapshot 2016-02-14 15:52 [Qemu-devel] crash with -incoming and -snapshot Paolo Bonzini @ 2016-02-14 16:12 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-02-15 9:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Kevin Wolf 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2016-02-14 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: qemu-devel, qemu block On 14/02/2016 16:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Reproducer: > > x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 \ > -incoming tcp:localhost:12345 -snapshot \ > /vm/virt_test/images/jeos-21-64-base.qcow2 > > > Weird as it may seem, this actually makes some sense for testing > migration with non-shared storage... In fact, migration with non-shared storage (migrate -b) is broken in general, even without -snapshot. Paolo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] crash with -incoming and -snapshot 2016-02-14 16:12 ` Paolo Bonzini @ 2016-02-15 9:12 ` Kevin Wolf 2016-02-15 9:26 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Kevin Wolf @ 2016-02-15 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: qemu-devel, qemu block Am 14.02.2016 um 17:12 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: > On 14/02/2016 16:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > Reproducer: > > > > x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 \ > > -incoming tcp:localhost:12345 -snapshot \ > > /vm/virt_test/images/jeos-21-64-base.qcow2 > > > > > > Weird as it may seem, this actually makes some sense for testing > > migration with non-shared storage... > > In fact, migration with non-shared storage (migrate -b) is broken in > general, even without -snapshot. Oh cool, does this mean that we can finally remove it? :-) Kevin ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] crash with -incoming and -snapshot 2016-02-15 9:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Kevin Wolf @ 2016-02-15 9:26 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-02-15 11:20 ` Kashyap Chamarthy 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2016-02-15 9:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kevin Wolf; +Cc: qemu-devel, qemu block On 15/02/2016 10:12, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 14.02.2016 um 17:12 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: >> On 14/02/2016 16:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> Reproducer: >>> >>> x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 \ >>> -incoming tcp:localhost:12345 -snapshot \ >>> /vm/virt_test/images/jeos-21-64-base.qcow2 >>> >>> >>> Weird as it may seem, this actually makes some sense for testing >>> migration with non-shared storage... >> >> In fact, migration with non-shared storage (migrate -b) is broken in >> general, even without -snapshot. > > Oh cool, does this mean that we can finally remove it? :-) I wouldn't object, but people are using it. :) Paolo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] crash with -incoming and -snapshot 2016-02-15 9:26 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini @ 2016-02-15 11:20 ` Kashyap Chamarthy 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Kashyap Chamarthy @ 2016-02-15 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paolo Bonzini; +Cc: Kevin Wolf, qemu-devel, qemu block On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 10:26:17AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 15/02/2016 10:12, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Am 14.02.2016 um 17:12 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: > >> On 14/02/2016 16:52, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >>> Reproducer: > >>> > >>> x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 \ > >>> -incoming tcp:localhost:12345 -snapshot \ > >>> /vm/virt_test/images/jeos-21-64-base.qcow2 > >>> > >>> > >>> Weird as it may seem, this actually makes some sense for testing > >>> migration with non-shared storage... > >> > >> In fact, migration with non-shared storage (migrate -b) is broken in > >> general, even without -snapshot. > > > > Oh cool, does this mean that we can finally remove it? :-) > > I wouldn't object, but people are using it. :) One case I know for sure: Upstream libvirt (consequently, OpenStack Nova) falls back to 'migrate -b'/("inc:" true) approach when there's no NBD support on the destination during live block migration: # From qemuMigrationRun() function in libvirt source $ less libvirt/src/qemu/qemu_migration.c [...] if (migrate_flags & (QEMU_MONITOR_MIGRATE_NON_SHARED_DISK | QEMU_MONITOR_MIGRATE_NON_SHARED_INC)) { if (mig->nbd) { /* This will update migrate_flags on success */ if (qemuMigrationDriveMirror(driver, vm, mig, spec->dest.host.name, migrate_speed, &migrate_flags, nmigrate_disks, migrate_disks, dconn) < 0) { goto cleanup; } } else { /* Destination doesn't support NBD server. * Fall back to previous implementation. */ VIR_DEBUG("Destination doesn't support NBD server " "Falling back to previous implementation."); } } [...] This fallback also kicks in when people enable TUNNELLED migration (as NBD does not have support for it in libvirt, due to valid technical reasons documented else where). -- /kashyap ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-15 11:21 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2016-02-14 15:52 [Qemu-devel] crash with -incoming and -snapshot Paolo Bonzini 2016-02-14 16:12 ` Paolo Bonzini 2016-02-15 9:12 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Kevin Wolf 2016-02-15 9:26 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini 2016-02-15 11:20 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).