From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38257) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWID1-0001oa-Qd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:37:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWICs-00085K-V6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 01:37:03 -0500 Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 12:06:39 +0530 From: Amit Shah Message-ID: <20160218063639.GB4440@grmbl.mre> References: <20160217160344.840.69108.stgit@bahia.huguette.org> <20160217160628.840.96784.stgit@bahia.huguette.org> <20160218025025.GE15224@voom.fritz.box> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160218025025.GE15224@voom.fritz.box> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] migration: allow to suppress configuration section submission List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Gibson Cc: Laurent Vivier , Juan Quintela , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, Greg Kurz On (Thu) 18 Feb 2016 [13:50:25], David Gibson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 05:06:43PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote: > > Since the addition of the configuration section in QEMU 2.4, it is impossible > > to migrate a pseries-2.3 machine back to QEMU 2.3. > > > > This patch makes it possible thanks to a new machine property which allows to > > disable configuration section submission. > > > > To disable submission, just add: > > > > -machine suppress-config-section=on > > > > Alternatively, if the target QEMU version isn't known at startup, this can > > be done later from the QEMU monitor with: > > > > qom-set /machine suppress-config-section on > > > > This property won't be automatically set for pseries-2.3 because it would > > then break backward migration to QEMU 2.4. If automatic behaviour is needed, > > it is up to the tooling to handle this. > > As noted elsewhere, I'd actually be ok with enabling it for > pseries-2.3. Basically we have to chose whether to work against qemu > 2.3 or 2.4 out of the box, we can't have both, and it sounds like qemu > 2.3 is more widely deployed than qemu 2.4. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz > > Reviewed-by: David Gibson > > I'm not sure whose tree these need to go in via. I'd like to see Juan's ack, and I'm fine if you take it via your tree. Amit