From: Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>
To: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] block/vpc: give option to force the current_size field in .bdrv_create
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:17:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160224211724.GA26318@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56CE0454.5050202@kamp.de>
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 08:28:20PM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Am 24.02.2016 um 14:40 schrieb Jeff Cody:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 02:07:18PM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> >> Am 24.02.2016 um 13:44 hat Peter Lieven geschrieben:
> >>> if the size is forced I would set the chs values to max. this way no
> >>> new creator String is needed and it is even backwards compatible. this
> >>> is what disk2vhd does.
> >> Does disk2vhd do it this way even if the size is smaller than the
> >> maximum that can be represented with CHS?
> >>
> > I don't know about disk2vhd, but I just created a 5G dynamic VHD
> > image on Hyper-V, and it produced:
> >
> > cyl: 10402, heads: 16, secs: 63
> > virtual size: 5.0G (5368709120 bytes)
> >
> > (the virtual size as calculated by CHS in that case would have been
> > 5368430592 bytes)
> >
> > I then tested the reverse - I modified qemu to create a VHD image with
> > 5G as the current_size, but maxed out CHS parameters. I imported it
> > into Hyper-V, and it worked fine - just recognized as a 5G disk with
> > 5368709120 bytes.
>
> So the idea to set CHS to MAX is not that bad.
>
I agree. I just did a test with disk2vhd, against an empty (but
formatted) 7.5G usb drive. Here is what it created:
# ./qemu-img info /mnt/nfs-2/tmp/WINtsts2.VHD
cyls: 65535, heads: 16, sectors: 255
image: /mnt/nfs-2/tmp/WINtsts2.VHD
file format: vpc
virtual size: 7.5G (8095006720 bytes)
I really like how one company has 3 different tools that all handle
this differently.
> >
> > But with all that, it seems like it may be better to mimic the Hyper-V
> > behavior, and use a new creator app string, with the normal CHS
> > values.
>
> But this means that it is not backwards compatible. Maxing out CHS
> when forcing the size would mean all old qemu version would look
> at current size and not CHS.
>
That is a valid concern. So, how about this:
With 'force_size' during image create, set the CHS parameters to MAX
(as d2v does), but also set the creator app to 'qem2'. This at least
gives other software a chance to learn that new creator app and handle
it differently, if needed (and it shouldn't hurt anything, and will
still be backwards compatible).
> Might it be that Hyper-V and others use CHS when an ATA disk is emulated
> and the cur_size otherwise? I think this is what virtualbox does.
I tested the Hyper-V created image under a Linux VM in Hyper-V. The
VM is using IDE controllers, and the image size was the current_size,
not the CHS calculation.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-24 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-24 0:47 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] VHD/VPC format compatibility Jeff Cody
2016-02-24 0:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] block/vpc: choose size calculation method based on creator_app field Jeff Cody
2016-02-24 0:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] block/vpc: tests for auto-detecting VPC and Hyper-V VHD images Jeff Cody
2016-02-24 10:23 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-02-24 12:19 ` Jeff Cody
2016-02-24 15:40 ` Jeff Cody
2016-02-24 15:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Max Reitz
2016-02-24 15:47 ` Jeff Cody
2016-02-24 15:49 ` Max Reitz
2016-02-24 0:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] block/vpc: give option to force the current_size field in .bdrv_create Jeff Cody
2016-02-24 10:19 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-02-24 12:24 ` Jeff Cody
2016-02-24 12:44 ` Peter Lieven
2016-02-24 13:07 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-02-24 13:40 ` Jeff Cody
2016-02-24 19:28 ` Peter Lieven
2016-02-24 21:17 ` Jeff Cody [this message]
2016-02-24 19:29 ` Peter Lieven
2016-02-24 0:47 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] block/vpc: add tests for image creation force_size parameter Jeff Cody
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160224211724.GA26318@localhost.localdomain \
--to=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@kamp.de \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).