From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45308)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>) id 1aZDfG-000233-Cg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 03:22:19 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>) id 1aZDfD-0002sC-6O
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 03:22:18 -0500
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 09:22:12 +0100
From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20160226082212.GB16305@toto>
References: <1455912292-23807-1-git-send-email-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
	<1455912292-23807-9-git-send-email-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>
	<CAFEAcA94S0eWzdUHBQ69PbRXgEJcvkSczU6qBE5FMboSfmxWZg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA94S0eWzdUHBQ69PbRXgEJcvkSczU6qBE5FMboSfmxWZg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 8/8] target-arm: Use isyn.swstep.ex to
 hold the is_ldex state
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Edgar Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, qemu-arm <qemu-arm@nongnu.org>, Sergey Fedorov <serge.fdrv@gmail.com>, Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>

On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 06:28:54PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 19 February 2016 at 20:04, Edgar E. Iglesias
> <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com> wrote:
> > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
> >
> > Switch to using isyn.swstep.ex to hold the is_ldex state for
> > SWStep syndrome generation.
> >
> > No functional change.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias <edgar.iglesias@xilinx.com>
> 
> What's the rationale for renaming the field? If this is groundwork
> for something else it might make more sense in a patchset with
> whatever is going to use this. Or is it just trying to make the
> swstep handling parallel the dabt syndrome info approach a bit more?

Yes, the latter. I can drop this one...

Cheers,
Edgar