From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42815) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZaHO-0003t8-Fl for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 03:31:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZaHN-0008Rx-NR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 03:31:10 -0500 Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 16:30:59 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20160227083059.GC12620@ad.usersys.redhat.com> References: <1453270306-16608-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <1453270306-16608-6-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <56A79883.3040703@virtuozzo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56A79883.3040703@virtuozzo.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 05/13] block: Hide HBitmap in block dirty bitmap interface List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy Cc: Kevin Wolf , Jeff Cody , jsnow@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org On Tue, 01/26 19:02, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > > why? The old way works for meta iters. The new code - doesn't. I suppose > > assert(iter->hbi.hb); > hbitmap_iter_init(&iter->hbi, iter->hbi.hb, sector_num); Okay, will change. Fam