From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50064)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1abB6T-00030d-C7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 13:02:35 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1abB6O-0002Aq-Dg
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 13:02:29 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42485)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1abB6O-0002Am-8I
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 13:02:24 -0500
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 20:02:20 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20160302200147-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
References: <1456913698-11452-1-git-send-email-clg@fr.ibm.com>
	<1456913698-11452-3-git-send-email-clg@fr.ibm.com>
	<20160302122030-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
	<56D72884.6050501@fr.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56D72884.6050501@fr.ibm.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 02/10] ipmi: replace IPMI_ADD_RSP_DATA()
 macro with inline helpers
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric?= Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum <marcel@redhat.com>, Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:53:08PM +0100, C=E9dric Le Goater wrote:
> > typedef struct RspBuffer RspBuffer;
>=20
> OK. So that's the rule for structs in qemu. It is not that clear
> when you look at the code around. I will change. np.

Did you look at CODING_STYLE? Pls do.