From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33261) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acc2F-0002I7-QB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 12:00:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acc2C-0007ys-IB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 12:00:03 -0500 Received: from domu-toccata.ens-lyon.fr ([140.77.166.138]:34490 helo=sonata.ens-lyon.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acc2C-0007yo-BP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 12:00:00 -0500 Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 17:59:54 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault Message-ID: <20160306165954.GJ2710@var.home> References: <56D94A46.80007@redhat.com> <56D9AEC8.50707@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56D9AEC8.50707@siemens.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv9 0/10] slirp: Adding IPv6 support to Qemu -net user mode List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Thomas Huth , zhanghailiang , Li Zhijian , Stefan Hajnoczi , Jason Wang , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Vasiliy Tolstov , Dave Gilbert , Gonglei , Huangpeng , Guillaume Subiron Hello, Jan Kiszka, on Fri 04 Mar 2016 16:50:32 +0100, wrote: > On 2016-03-04 09:41, Thomas Huth wrote: > > On 22.02.2016 20:28, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> This is another respin of IPv6 in Qemu -net user mode. > >> > >> These patches add ICMPv6, NDP, make UDP and TCP compatible with IPv6, and add > >> TFTP over IPv6. > > > > *ping* > > > > Jan, Jason, > > > > could you please have a look at this series? Would be cool to include it > > for 2.6 so that we'd finally have IPv6 support in Slirp, too. > > As far as I could see, the patches look fine now - there was just one > > rather cosmetic issue left in patch 9/10, but it should also be ok in > > the current shape already, I think, so IMHO no need for a respin. > > As indicated before, we need someone else than me to manage the slirp > system. I'm out of bandwidth for this task, sorry. Ok, Jason? I'm really surprised that a patch that has been reviewed two times (by me then by Thomas) seems so difficult to get it. I understand that it's far from trivial, but I have concerns with how qemu can manage contributions. Samuel