From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59477) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acrjq-0003cQ-MP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 04:46:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acrjn-0005HT-Bt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 04:46:06 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57626) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acrjn-0005GW-6N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 04:46:03 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 17:45:58 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20160307094558.GA19536@ad.usersys.redhat.com> References: <1456813104-25902-5-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <1457342271-13410-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <56DD4BD4.5060905@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56DD4BD4.5060905@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] scripts: Fix dump-guest-memory.py for MemoryRegion.ram_block removal List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laszlo Ersek Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Gonglei , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Xu , Janosch Frank On Mon, 03/07 10:37, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 03/07/16 10:17, Fam Zheng wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng > > > > --- > > > > This goes after "[PATCH v2 4/7] memory: Drop MemoryRegion.ram_addr" (or > > squashed into it if we want strict synchronization). > > --- > > scripts/dump-guest-memory.py | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/scripts/dump-guest-memory.py b/scripts/dump-guest-memory.py > > index f274bf8..c0a2e99 100644 > > --- a/scripts/dump-guest-memory.py > > +++ b/scripts/dump-guest-memory.py > > @@ -352,7 +352,7 @@ def memory_region_get_ram_ptr(memory_region): > > return (memory_region_get_ram_ptr(memory_region["alias"].dereference()) > > + memory_region["alias_offset"]) > > > > - return qemu_get_ram_ptr(memory_region["ram_addr"] & TARGET_PAGE_MASK) > > + return qemu_get_ram_ptr(memory_region["ram_block"]["offset"]) > > > > > > def get_guest_phys_blocks(): > > > > I didn't follow your series, and I've by now forgotten most of the dump > stuff, but if you tested the above with GDB, I can ack it. For the record, yes, I've tested it on top of this series and the command works for me. Fam > > Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek > > I hope that Janosch can chime in as well. > > Thanks > Laszlo