From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Baumann <Andrew.Baumann@microsoft.com>
Cc: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] broken socket events on win32 qemu
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 10:19:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160307101914.GA13034@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BLUPR0301MB203444C583148B03DED505129EB10@BLUPR0301MB2034.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 07:23:12AM +0000, Andrew Baumann wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> This commit ("char: convert from GIOChannel to QIOChannel"):
> https://github.com/qemu/qemu/commit/9894dc0cdcc397ee5b26370bc53da6d360a363c2
> ... appears to have broken socket events for character devices on Win32.
> For example, I can no longer connect to a GDB stub (started with:
> "-gdb tcp:127.0.0.1:1234"), since tcp_chr_accept is never called.
>
> Without having looked very closely at the code, I suspect the problem may
> be that we've lost the special-case treatment of socket handles as distinct
> from file descriptors on Win32 (they are different namespaces, and different
> APIs are needed). The previous version of qemu-char.c special-cased sockets
> in io_channel_from_socket():
>
> -#ifdef _WIN32
> - chan = g_io_channel_win32_new_socket(fd);
> -#else
> - chan = g_io_channel_unix_new(fd);
> -#endif
>
> ... but I don't see anything equivalent in io/channel-socket.c. Am I looking
> in the wrong place?
No, you are correct, this is broken for the reason you describe. Seems
this is the one key feature I forgot to add unit test coverage for :-(
> BTW, The same change introduces another problem on win32: server sockets
> like the GDB example above fail on getpeername() with "Unable to query
> remote socket address: Unknown error". This seems to be caused by a
> definition of ENOTCONN that is not WSAENOTCONN. I'm still trying to
> figure out why that is, and how to best fix it.
Can you say how you are building QEMU ? Are you using mingw to do a cross
compile for Win32, or something else ?
Looking at my local Mingw64 install, the errno definitions look potentially
problematic· The QEMU socket_error() method is quite crude - it simply
expands to WSAGetLastError(), so any code calling it is assuming that the
WSAExxxxx constants match the Exxxx constants. QEMU has a header which
sets up such a mapping, but it only does so conditionally. eg in
include/sysemu/os-win32.h
#ifndef ENOTCONN
# define ENOTCONN WSAENOTCONN
#endif
The current versions of mingw64 I have installed though has a winerror.h
which defines
#define WSABASEERR 10000
#define WSAENOTCONN (WSABASEERR + 57)
And a separate errno.h that defines
#ifndef ENOTCONN
#define ENOTCONN 126
#endif
This obviously does not match the WSAENOTCONN value
So my guess would be that QEMU is pulling in the mingw64 errno.h values
and so QEMU's own os-win32.h hack is not getting activated.
Really, I think the problem is QEMU's socket_error() compat wrapper. It
is fundamentally not reliable to assume WSAExxxx == Exxxx values, which
is what socket_error() forces callers todo.
I think we should we re-implement socket_error() for win32 to do this
int socket_error(void) {
switch (WSAGetLastError()) {
case WSAENOTCONN:
return ENOTCONN;
case WSAECONNREFUSED:
return ECONNREFUSED;
case WSAEBADF:
return EBADF;
....etc for the other errno mpappings w eneed to care about...
}
}
this is what GLib itself does internally for addressing this problem
(see g_io_error_from_win32_error in gio/gioerror.c)
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-07 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-07 7:23 [Qemu-devel] broken socket events on win32 qemu Andrew Baumann
2016-03-07 8:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-07 10:19 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2016-03-07 12:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-07 18:23 ` Andrew Baumann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160307101914.GA13034@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=Andrew.Baumann@microsoft.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).