From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43274) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1actVW-0004vk-5x for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 06:39:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1actVS-0000gC-U6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 06:39:26 -0500 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:10386) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1actVS-0000g2-N6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 06:39:22 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 12:39:21 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault Message-ID: <20160307113921.GF5169@var.bordeaux.inria.fr> References: <56DD2821.6020405@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56DD2821.6020405@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCHv9 09/10] qapi-schema, qemu-options & slirp: Adding Qemu options for IPv6 addresses List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jason Wang Cc: Thomas Huth , zhanghailiang , Li Zhijian , Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Vasiliy Tolstov , Dave Gilbert , Yann Bordenave , Gonglei , Jan Kiszka , Huangpeng , Guillaume Subiron Jason Wang, on Mon 07 Mar 2016 15:05:05 +0800, wrote: > Please do unnecessary changes like this since it will cause extra effort > for git blame and other things. Which is exactly why we avoided to fix all the checkpatch warnings by leaving existing non-qemu-style indentation. Samuel