From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38254) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adA4L-0005v7-U9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:20:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adA4L-0002FP-4O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 00:20:29 -0500 Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 13:20:07 +0800 From: Peter Xu Message-ID: <20160308052007.GB2377@pxdev.xzpeter.org> References: <1457324608-11434-1-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> <1457344554.4468.12.camel@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1457344554.4468.12.camel@redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] ARM: add query-gic-capability SMP command List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andrea Bolognani Cc: wei@redhat.com, peter.maydell@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-arm@nongnu.org On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:55:54AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote: > I tested this both on a v2-only machine >=20 > =C2=A0 {"return": [ > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0{"emulated": false, "version": 3, "kernel": fal= se}, > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0{"emulated": true, "version": 2, "kernel": true= } > =C2=A0 ]} >=20 > and on a v3-only machine >=20 > =C2=A0 {"return": [ > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0{"emulated": false, "version": 3, "kernel": tru= e}, > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0{"emulated": true, "version": 2, "kernel": fals= e} > =C2=A0 ]} >=20 > The output looks good to me - I'll leave reviewing the > implementation to someone with more QEMU knowledge than me, that > is, any QEMU knowledge at all ;) Appreciated for helping verify this! :-) >=20 > One last, purely cosmetic, bit: should the command name be > query-gic-capabilities rather than query-gic-capability? Any > native speaker feels like weighing in? Yah, it seems that "query-gic-capabilities" sounds better. Will use that in next spin if no one oppose. Thanks! Peter