From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH] qed: fix bdrv_qed_drain
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:59:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160308095951.GC5807@noname.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160308095238.GA9407@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1383 bytes --]
Am 08.03.2016 um 10:52 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 10:22:58PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 07/03/2016 21:56, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > I think the timer concept itself is troublesome. A radical approach but
> > > limited to changing QED itself is to drop the timer and instead keep a
> > > timestamp for the last allocating write request. Next time a write
> > > request (allocating or rewriting) is about to complete, do the flush and
> > > clear the need check flag as part of the write request (if 5 seconds
> > > have passed since the timestamp).
> >
> > bdrv_qed_drain should be easy to fix in my new drain implementation,
> > which is based on draining the parent before the BdrvChild-ren. It's
> > just troublesome in the current one which alternates flushing and draining.
> >
> > I would just revert the patch that introduced bdrv_qed_drain for now,
> > and reintroduce it later (note however that something was messed up in
> > commit df9a681, "qed: Implement .bdrv_drain", 2015-11-12, because it
> > includes some dirty bitmap stuff).
>
> You're right, that might be the best solution for the time being. AFAIK
> the need check write is harmless. It does not result in a guest-visible
> change and is basically just a flush + header update.
I think it caused occasional assertion failures.
Kevin
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-08 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-16 15:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qed: fix bdrv_qed_drain Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-17 2:57 ` Fam Zheng
2016-02-17 11:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 5:57 ` Fam Zheng
2016-02-23 10:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-23 12:49 ` Fam Zheng
2016-02-23 13:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-07 16:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Kevin Wolf
2016-03-07 20:56 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-03-07 21:22 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2016-03-08 9:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-03-08 9:59 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2016-03-08 9:58 ` Kevin Wolf
2016-03-09 15:37 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2016-03-07 20:57 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160308095951.GC5807@noname.str.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).