From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, agraf@suse.de, pkrempa@redhat.com,
ehabkost@redhat.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
armbru@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com,
mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, afaerber@suse.de,
david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 01/10] exec: Remove cpu from cpus list during cpu_exec_exit()
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 13:27:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160309075710.GE29692@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56DDAB14.8020507@redhat.com>
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 05:23:48PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 04.03.2016 07:54, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > CPUState *cpu gets added to the cpus list during cpu_exec_init(). It
> > should be removed from cpu_exec_exit().
> >
> > cpu_exec_init() is called from generic CPU::instance_finalize and some
>
> s/cpu_exec_init/cpu_exec_exit/
>
> > archs like PowerPC call it from CPU unrealizefn. So ensure that we
> > dequeue the cpu only once.
> >
> > Now -1 value for cpu->cpu_index indicates that we have already dequeued
> > the cpu for CONFIG_USER_ONLY case also.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > exec.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
> > index c62c439..7c3f747 100644
> > --- a/exec.c
> > +++ b/exec.c
> > @@ -588,15 +588,9 @@ static int cpu_get_free_index(Error **errp)
> > return cpu;
> > }
> >
> > -void cpu_exec_exit(CPUState *cpu)
> > +static void cpu_release_index(CPUState *cpu)
> > {
> > - if (cpu->cpu_index == -1) {
> > - /* cpu_index was never allocated by this @cpu or was already freed. */
> > - return;
> > - }
> > -
> > bitmap_clear(cpu_index_map, cpu->cpu_index, 1);
> > - cpu->cpu_index = -1;
> > }
> > #else
> >
> > @@ -611,11 +605,33 @@ static int cpu_get_free_index(Error **errp)
> > return cpu_index;
> > }
> >
> > -void cpu_exec_exit(CPUState *cpu)
> > +static void cpu_release_index(CPUState *cpu)
> > {
> > + return;
>
> You could also simply leave that return statement away, I think.
>
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > +void cpu_exec_exit(CPUState *cpu)
> > +{
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > + cpu_list_lock();
> > +#endif
> > + if (cpu->cpu_index == -1) {
> > + /* cpu_index was never allocated by this @cpu or was already freed. */
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > + cpu_list_unlock();
> > +#endif
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + QTAILQ_REMOVE(&cpus, cpu, node);
> > + cpu_release_index(cpu);
> > + cpu->cpu_index = -1;
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > + cpu_list_unlock();
> > +#endif
> > +}
>
> Since there are a couple of these
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> cpu_list_[un]lock();
> #endif
>
> in exec.c already, it might be somewhat nices to declare them at the
> beginning of the file as empty functions, somewhat like:
>
> #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> static inline void cpu_list_lock(void)
> {
> }
> static inline void cpu_list_unlock(void)
> {
> }
> #endif
>
> What do you think about that?
If you and/or the maintainer insist/prefer, I can make the change.
Regards,
Bharata.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-09 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-04 6:54 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 00/10] Core based CPU hotplug for PowerPC sPAPR Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04 6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 01/10] exec: Remove cpu from cpus list during cpu_exec_exit() Bharata B Rao
2016-03-07 2:41 ` David Gibson
2016-03-07 16:23 ` Thomas Huth
2016-03-09 7:57 ` Bharata B Rao [this message]
2016-03-09 8:13 ` Thomas Huth
2016-03-04 6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 02/10] exec: Do vmstate unregistration from cpu_exec_exit() Bharata B Rao
2016-03-07 2:51 ` David Gibson
2016-03-07 3:38 ` Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04 6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 03/10] cpu: Reclaim vCPU objects Bharata B Rao
2016-03-07 19:05 ` Thomas Huth
2016-03-09 4:59 ` Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04 6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 04/10] cpu: Add a sync version of cpu_remove() Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04 6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 05/10] cpu: Abstract CPU core type Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04 10:38 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-04 11:02 ` Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04 18:07 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-07 3:36 ` David Gibson
2016-03-07 8:31 ` Bharata B Rao
2016-03-07 10:40 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-08 3:57 ` David Gibson
2016-03-08 9:11 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-09 2:55 ` David Gibson
2016-03-09 10:32 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-10 5:04 ` David Gibson
2016-03-10 9:35 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-07 10:29 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-08 4:26 ` David Gibson
2016-03-09 10:40 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-09 23:42 ` David Gibson
2016-03-10 9:39 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-04 6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 06/10] spapr: CPU core device Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04 6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 07/10] spapr: Represent boot CPUs as spapr-cpu-core devices Bharata B Rao
2016-03-07 3:45 ` David Gibson
2016-03-09 8:01 ` Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04 6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 08/10] spapr: CPU hotplug support Bharata B Rao
2016-03-07 3:49 ` David Gibson
2016-03-07 6:29 ` Bharata B Rao
2016-03-07 11:01 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-08 4:27 ` David Gibson
2016-03-08 9:37 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-09 2:58 ` David Gibson
2016-03-09 7:53 ` Bharata B Rao
2016-03-09 12:53 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-09 10:48 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-04 6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 09/10] xics, xics_kvm: Handle CPU unplug correctly Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04 6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 10/10] spapr: CPU hot unplug support Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04 10:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 00/10] Core based CPU hotplug for PowerPC sPAPR Igor Mammedov
2016-03-07 3:53 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160309075710.GE29692@in.ibm.com \
--to=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pkrempa@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).