qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, agraf@suse.de, pkrempa@redhat.com,
	ehabkost@redhat.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	armbru@redhat.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com,
	mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, afaerber@suse.de,
	david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 01/10] exec: Remove cpu from cpus list during cpu_exec_exit()
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 13:27:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160309075710.GE29692@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56DDAB14.8020507@redhat.com>

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 05:23:48PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 04.03.2016 07:54, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > CPUState *cpu gets added to the cpus list during cpu_exec_init(). It
> > should be removed from cpu_exec_exit().
> > 
> > cpu_exec_init() is called from generic CPU::instance_finalize and some
> 
> s/cpu_exec_init/cpu_exec_exit/
> 
> > archs like PowerPC call it from CPU unrealizefn. So ensure that we
> > dequeue the cpu only once.
> > 
> > Now -1 value for cpu->cpu_index indicates that we have already dequeued
> > the cpu for CONFIG_USER_ONLY case also.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  exec.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
> > index c62c439..7c3f747 100644
> > --- a/exec.c
> > +++ b/exec.c
> > @@ -588,15 +588,9 @@ static int cpu_get_free_index(Error **errp)
> >      return cpu;
> >  }
> >  
> > -void cpu_exec_exit(CPUState *cpu)
> > +static void cpu_release_index(CPUState *cpu)
> >  {
> > -    if (cpu->cpu_index == -1) {
> > -        /* cpu_index was never allocated by this @cpu or was already freed. */
> > -        return;
> > -    }
> > -
> >      bitmap_clear(cpu_index_map, cpu->cpu_index, 1);
> > -    cpu->cpu_index = -1;
> >  }
> >  #else
> >  
> > @@ -611,11 +605,33 @@ static int cpu_get_free_index(Error **errp)
> >      return cpu_index;
> >  }
> >  
> > -void cpu_exec_exit(CPUState *cpu)
> > +static void cpu_release_index(CPUState *cpu)
> >  {
> > +    return;
> 
> You could also simply leave that return statement away, I think.
> 
> >  }
> >  #endif
> >  
> > +void cpu_exec_exit(CPUState *cpu)
> > +{
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > +    cpu_list_lock();
> > +#endif
> > +    if (cpu->cpu_index == -1) {
> > +        /* cpu_index was never allocated by this @cpu or was already freed. */
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > +        cpu_list_unlock();
> > +#endif
> > +        return;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    QTAILQ_REMOVE(&cpus, cpu, node);
> > +    cpu_release_index(cpu);
> > +    cpu->cpu_index = -1;
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > +    cpu_list_unlock();
> > +#endif
> > +}
> 
> Since there are a couple of these
> 
> #if defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
>     cpu_list_[un]lock();
> #endif
> 
> in exec.c already, it might be somewhat nices to declare them at the
> beginning of the file as empty functions, somewhat like:
> 
> #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> static inline void cpu_list_lock(void)
> {
> }
> static inline void cpu_list_unlock(void)
> {
> }
> #endif
> 
> What do you think about that?

If you and/or the maintainer insist/prefer, I can make the change.

Regards,
Bharata.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-03-09  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-04  6:54 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 00/10] Core based CPU hotplug for PowerPC sPAPR Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04  6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 01/10] exec: Remove cpu from cpus list during cpu_exec_exit() Bharata B Rao
2016-03-07  2:41   ` David Gibson
2016-03-07 16:23   ` Thomas Huth
2016-03-09  7:57     ` Bharata B Rao [this message]
2016-03-09  8:13       ` Thomas Huth
2016-03-04  6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 02/10] exec: Do vmstate unregistration from cpu_exec_exit() Bharata B Rao
2016-03-07  2:51   ` David Gibson
2016-03-07  3:38     ` Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04  6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 03/10] cpu: Reclaim vCPU objects Bharata B Rao
2016-03-07 19:05   ` Thomas Huth
2016-03-09  4:59     ` Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04  6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 04/10] cpu: Add a sync version of cpu_remove() Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04  6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 05/10] cpu: Abstract CPU core type Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04 10:38   ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-04 11:02     ` Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04 18:07       ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-07  3:36         ` David Gibson
2016-03-07  8:31           ` Bharata B Rao
2016-03-07 10:40             ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-08  3:57               ` David Gibson
2016-03-08  9:11                 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-09  2:55                   ` David Gibson
2016-03-09 10:32                     ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-10  5:04                       ` David Gibson
2016-03-10  9:35                         ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-07 10:29           ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-08  4:26             ` David Gibson
2016-03-09 10:40               ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-09 23:42                 ` David Gibson
2016-03-10  9:39                   ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-04  6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 06/10] spapr: CPU core device Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04  6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 07/10] spapr: Represent boot CPUs as spapr-cpu-core devices Bharata B Rao
2016-03-07  3:45   ` David Gibson
2016-03-09  8:01     ` Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04  6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 08/10] spapr: CPU hotplug support Bharata B Rao
2016-03-07  3:49   ` David Gibson
2016-03-07  6:29     ` Bharata B Rao
2016-03-07 11:01       ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-08  4:27       ` David Gibson
2016-03-08  9:37         ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-09  2:58           ` David Gibson
2016-03-09  7:53             ` Bharata B Rao
2016-03-09 12:53               ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-09 10:48             ` Igor Mammedov
2016-03-04  6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 09/10] xics, xics_kvm: Handle CPU unplug correctly Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04  6:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 10/10] spapr: CPU hot unplug support Bharata B Rao
2016-03-04 10:57 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v1 00/10] Core based CPU hotplug for PowerPC sPAPR Igor Mammedov
2016-03-07  3:53   ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160309075710.GE29692@in.ibm.com \
    --to=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
    --cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pkrempa@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).