From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52202)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <olaf@aepfle.de>) id 1adhJo-0001kM-OH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 11:50:41 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <olaf@aepfle.de>) id 1adhJn-0002dt-Uj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 11:50:40 -0500
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 17:50:26 +0100
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Message-ID: <20160309165026.GA14059@aepfle.de>
References: <20160309121139.GA21975@aepfle.de> <56E0173C.70407@redhat.com>
	<20160309144514.GA29027@aepfle.de>
	<20160309145837.GI5205@noname.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160309145837.GI5205@noname.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] bogus bdrv_check_request in bdrv_co_discard
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

On Wed, Mar 09, Kevin Wolf wrote:

> Removing integer overflow checks without removing the potentially
> overflowing operation doesn't feel like a particularly good idea,
> though.

Why does the code use signed ints anyway for sectors and offset?!

Olaf