From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu v2] spapr/target-ppc/kvm: Only add hcall-instructions if KVM supports it
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:17:47 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160321041747.GF23586@voom.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458526442-2125-1-git-send-email-aik@ozlabs.ru>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2108 bytes --]
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 01:14:02PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> ePAPR defines "hcall-instructions" device-tree property which contains
> code to call hypercalls in ePAPR paravirtualized guests. In general
> pseries guests should not be using this facility (as there is sPAPR
> interface) and this property should not be present in the device tree
> for pseries guests.
>
> However a while ago this interface was chosen to implement a hypervisor
> interface to speed up PR KVM guests and since then the property is always
> present in the device tree. All KVM guests use it at least to read features
> via the KVM_HC_FEATURES hypercall.
>
> The property is populated by the code returned from the KVM's
> KVM_PPC_GET_PVINFO ioctl; if not implemented in the KVM, QEMU writes there
> "li r3, -1; nop; nop; nop". If QEMU does not create the property, and
> the guest kernel is compiled with CONFIG_EPAPR_PARAVIRT (which is
> normally the case), there is exactly the same stub at
> @epapr_hypercall_start already.
>
> Rather than maintaining the property (which used to be BE only; then was
> fixed to be endian-agnostic) and confusing the guest (which might think
> there is ePAPR host while there is none), it makes sense not to create
> the property in the device tree in the first place if the host kernel
> does not implement it.
>
> This changes kvmppc_get_hypercall() to return 1 if the host kernel
> does not implement KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_PVINFO. The caller can use it to decide
> on whether to create the property or not.
>
> This changes the pseries machine to not create the property if KVM does
> not implement KVM_PPC_GET_PVINFO. In practice this means that from now
> on the property will not be created if either HV KVM or TCG is used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Further reworded the commit message and merged to ppc-for-2.6.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-21 4:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-21 2:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu v2] spapr/target-ppc/kvm: Only add hcall-instructions if KVM supports it Alexey Kardashevskiy
2016-03-21 4:17 ` David Gibson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160321041747.GF23586@voom.redhat.com \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).