From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60025) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiAEV-0006mP-Kd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 20:31:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiAEU-0002hy-Sa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 20:31:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 08:31:32 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20160322003132.GD24609@ad.usersys.redhat.com> References: <56EAA170.1000904@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <56EAA576.8020709@de.ibm.com> <56EAC706.2040006@redhat.com> <56EACA22.2020505@de.ibm.com> <56EACA64.9060402@de.ibm.com> <56EAD69B.10107@de.ibm.com> <56EC18A7.6070709@redhat.com> <56EFFB70.5050801@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <56EFFCFC.8090808@redhat.com> <20160321151945.1aebbe45.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160321151945.1aebbe45.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] Tweaks around virtio-blk start/stop List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cornelia Huck Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-block@nongnu.org, TU BO , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Christian Borntraeger , Stefan Hajnoczi , Paolo Bonzini On Mon, 03/21 15:19, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:54:04 +0100 > Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 21/03/2016 14:47, TU BO wrote: > > >> I'll see if I can produce something based on Conny's patches, which are > > >> already a start. Today I had a short day so I couldn't play with the > > >> bug; out of curiosity, does the bug reproduce with her work + patch 4 > > >> from this series + the reentrancy assertion? > > > I did NOT see crash with qemu master + "[PATCH RFC 0/6] virtio: refactor > > > host notifiers" from Conny + patch 4 + assertion. thx > > > > That's unexpected, but I guess it only says that I didn't review her > > patches well enough. :) > > I'm also a bit surprised, the only thing that should really be > different is passing the 'assign' argument in stop_ioeventfd(). Any > other fixes are purely accidental :) > > Would be interesting to see how this setup fares with virtio-pci. > Seems to fix the assertion I'm hitting too. Fam