From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41746) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiYkm-0003CA-3G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 22:42:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiYkf-00082S-VR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 22:42:36 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52241) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiYkf-000822-QA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 22:42:29 -0400 Received: from int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.27]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD6A7711CB for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 02:42:28 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:42:25 +0800 From: Peter Xu Message-ID: <20160323024225.GC28183@pxdev.xzpeter.org> References: <20160322030112.GA28183@pxdev.xzpeter.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] vfio: add check for memory region overflow condition List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Bandan Das Cc: Alex Williamson , qemu-devel On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:07:00PM -0400, Bandan Das wrote: > Thank you Peter, I wasn't aware. But unfortunately, I don't think he's doing the right > thing either when handing @end ? Oh well, it's a RFC :) Possibly. Just to make sure you know about the whole thing (rather than only the @end fix), since I see that fixing the core dump should possibly be the start to move on to VFIO+IOMMU. As you mentioned, guessing that it's never a bad thing to know more about ideas. :) Thanks. -- peterx