From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33558) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiut6-0001dH-54 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 22:20:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aiut5-0008Up-9f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 22:20:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 10:20:25 +0800 From: Peter Xu Message-ID: <20160324022025.GY28183@pxdev.xzpeter.org> References: <1458711153-15988-1-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> <1458711153-15988-5-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> <56F28D15.5070302@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56F28D15.5070302@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH v6 4/4] arm: implement query-gic-capabilities List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Sergey Fedorov Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, drjones@redhat.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, libvir-list@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, qemu-arm@nongnu.org, abologna@redhat.com On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:33:25PM +0300, Sergey Fedorov wrote: > On 23/03/16 08:32, Peter Xu wrote: > > diff --git a/target-arm/monitor.c b/target-arm/monitor.c > > index 254a9c9..4a2db59 100644 > > --- a/target-arm/monitor.c > > +++ b/target-arm/monitor.c > > @@ -21,8 +21,66 @@ > (snip) > > GICCapabilityResult *qmp_query_gic_capabilities(Error **errp) > > { > > - return NULL; > > + GICCapabilityResult *result = g_new0(GICCapabilityResult, 1); > > + GICCapabilityList *head = NULL; > > + GICCapability *v2 = gic_cap_new(2), *v3 = gic_cap_new(3); > > + > > + v2->emulated = true; > > + /* FIXME: we'd change to true after we get emulated GICv3. */ > > Maybewe'd better use'NOTE:' or 'TODO:' instead of 'FIXME:'? Right. > > > + v3->emulated = false; > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM > > + { > > + int fdarray[3]; > > + > > + if (!kvm_arm_create_scratch_host_vcpu(NULL, fdarray, NULL)) { > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > + /* Test KVM GICv2 */ > > + if (kvm_support_device(fdarray[1], KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2)) { > > + v2->kernel = true; > > + } > > + > > + /* Test KVM GICv3 */ > > + if (kvm_support_device(fdarray[1], KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3)) { > > + v3->kernel = true; > > + } > > + > > + kvm_arm_destroy_scratch_host_vcpu(fdarray); > > +out: > > + ; > > + } > > +#endif > > Probably, it would be neater to put KVM part into a separate static > inline function. Seems so. Will fix. Thanks. -- peterx