From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48209) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amL7K-0006oq-T5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 08:57:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amL7H-0001rk-Kp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 08:57:30 -0400 Received: from barbershop.grep.be ([89.106.240.122]:44629) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amL7H-0001ns-Eh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 02 Apr 2016 08:57:27 -0400 Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2016 14:57:06 +0200 From: Wouter Verhelst Message-ID: <20160402125706.GA16048@grep.be> References: <1459504482-64928-1-git-send-email-alex@alex.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1459504482-64928-1-git-send-email-alex@alex.org.uk> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] [PATCHv2] Improve documentation of FUA and FLUSH List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alex Bligh Cc: "nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 10:54:42AM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote: > Improve the documentation of NBD_CMD_FLUSH and NBD_CMD_FLAG_FUA. Specifically > the latter may be set on any command, and its semantics on commands other > than NBD_CMD_WRITE need explaining. Further, explain how these relate to > reordering of commands. This seems still a WIP. I'm not sure what the best way forward with this thing is... (other stuff has been merged now) -- < ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules, and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too. -- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12