From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52951) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anY74-0002xx-AQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 17:02:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anY70-0003Cy-7H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 17:02:14 -0400 Received: from barbershop.grep.be ([89.106.240.122]:47681) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anY70-0003CM-2E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 17:02:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 23:01:57 +0200 From: Wouter Verhelst Message-ID: <20160405210157.GD13913@grep.be> References: <1459874594-17134-1-git-send-email-alex@alex.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1459874594-17134-1-git-send-email-alex@alex.org.uk> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] [PATCHv5] Improve the documentation of NBD_CMD_FLUSH and NBD_CMD_FLAG_FUA. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alex Bligh Cc: "nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 05:43:14PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote: > Improve the documentation of NBD_CMD_FLUSH and NBD_CMD_FLAG_FUA. Specifically > the latter may be set on any command, and its semantics on commands other > than NBD_CMD_WRITE need explaining. Further, explain how these relate to > reordering of commands. [...] applied, thanks. -- < ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules, and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too. -- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12