From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Victor Kaplansky <victork@redhat.com>,
"quintela@redhat.com" <quintela@redhat.com>,
"Li, Liang Z" <liang.z.li@intel.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"amit.shah@redhat.com" <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [v2 0/2] add avx2 instruction optimization
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:42:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160407134230.GD2240@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160407154040-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
* Michael S. Tsirkin (mst@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 12:09:52PM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > * Eric Blake (eblake@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > On 11/12/2015 12:56 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > >
> > > >> One thing I still can't understand, why the unit test in host environment shows
> > > >> 'memcmp()' have better performance?
> > >
> > > Have you tried running under a profiler, to see if there are hotspots or
> > > at least get an idea of where the time is being spent?
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Are you aware of any program other than QEMU that also wants to do something
> > > > similar? Finding whether a block of memory is zero, sounds like something
> > > > that would be useful in lots of places, I just can't think which ones.
> > >
> > > At least dd, cp, and probably several other utilities. It would be nice
> > > to post an RFE to glibc to see if they can come up with a dedicated
> > > interface that is faster than memcmp(), although that still only helps
> > > us when targetting a system new enough to have that interface.
> >
> > I've just posted that RFE:
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19920
> >
> > Dave
>
> Have you guys seen the discussion in
> http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=560#respond
>
> In particular it claims this is close to optimal:
>
>
> char check_zero(char *p, int len)
> {
> char res = 0;
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> res = res | p[i];
> }
>
> return res;
> }
>
>
> If you compile this function with --tree-vectorize and --unroll-loops.
>
> Now, this version always scans all of the buffer, so
> it will be slower when buffer is *not* all-zeroes.
>
> Which might indicate that you need to know what your
> workload is to implement compare to zero efficiently,
> and if that is the case, it's not clear this is appropriate for libc.
On the contrary; anything that needs a couple of carefully chosen
compiler switches and assumes a particular workload is much
better optimised in a library for the general workload.
Dave
>
> > > --
> > > Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
> > > Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-07 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-10 2:51 [Qemu-devel] [v2 0/2] add avx2 instruction optimization Liang Li
2015-11-10 2:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [v2 1/2] cutils: " Liang Li
2015-11-12 10:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-12 10:12 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-12 11:30 ` Juan Quintela
2015-11-13 2:49 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-13 9:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-12 14:43 ` Richard Henderson
2015-11-10 2:51 ` [Qemu-devel] [v2 2/2] configure: add options to config avx2 Liang Li
2015-11-10 3:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [v2 0/2] add avx2 instruction optimization Eric Blake
2015-11-10 5:48 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-10 9:13 ` Juan Quintela
2015-11-10 9:26 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-10 9:35 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-10 9:41 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-10 9:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-10 9:56 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-10 10:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-10 10:04 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-12 2:49 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-12 8:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-12 8:53 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-12 9:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-12 9:40 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-12 9:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-12 9:53 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-12 11:34 ` Juan Quintela
2015-11-12 11:42 ` Li, Liang Z
2015-11-12 19:56 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-11-12 20:20 ` Eric Blake
2016-04-07 11:09 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-04-07 12:54 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-07 13:42 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2016-04-07 13:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-11-10 9:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160407134230.GD2240@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=liang.z.li@intel.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=victork@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).