From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: xiecl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] nbd: do not hang nbd_wr_syncv if outside a coroutine and no available data
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:45:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160407134550.GG19932@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460029495-7146-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 01:44:55PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Until commit 1c778ef7 ("nbd: convert to using I/O channels for actual
> socket I/O", 2016-02-16), nbd_wr_sync returned -EAGAIN this scenario.
> nbd_reply_ready required these semantics because it has two conflicting
> requirements:
>
> 1) if a reply can be received on the socket, nbd_reply_ready needs
> to read the header outside coroutine context to identify _which_
> coroutine to enter to process the rest of the reply
>
> 2) on the other hand, nbd_reply_ready can find a false positive if
> another thread (e.g. a VCPU thread running aio_poll) sneaks in and
> calls nbd_reply_ready too. In this case nbd_reply_ready does nothing
> and expects nbd_wr_syncv to return -EAGAIN.
>
> Currently, the solution to the first requirement is to wait in the very
> rare case of a read() that doesn't retrieve the reply header in its
> entirety; this is what nbd_wr_syncv does by calling qio_channel_wait().
> However, the unconditional call to qio_channel_wait() breaks the second
> requirement. To fix this, the patch makes nbd_wr_syncv return -EAGAIN
> if done is zero, similar to the code before commit 1c778ef7.
>
> This is okay because NBD client-side negotiation is the only other case
> that calls nbd_wr_syncv outside a coroutine, and it places the socket
> in blocking mode. On the other hand, it is a bit unpleasant to put
> this in nbd_wr_syncv(), because the function is used by both client
> and server.
>
> The full fix would be to add a counter to NbdClientSession for how
> many bytes have been filled in s->reply. Then a reply can be filled
> by multiple separate invocations of nbd_reply_ready and the
> qio_channel_wait() call can be removed completely. Something to
> consider for 2.7...
>
> Reported-by: Changlong Xie <xiecl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> nbd/common.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-07 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-07 11:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] nbd: do not hang nbd_wr_syncv if outside a coroutine and no available data Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-07 13:45 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2016-04-08 5:16 ` Changlong Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160407134550.GG19932@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=xiecl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).