From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoq1S-0003hj-En for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 06:21:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoq1P-0007Hg-8p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 06:21:46 -0400 Received: from barbershop.grep.be ([89.106.240.122]:37991) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoq1P-0007HD-2W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 06:21:43 -0400 Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:21:36 +0200 From: Wouter Verhelst Message-ID: <20160409102136.GK19023@grep.be> References: <1460153158-21612-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1460153158-21612-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Nbd] [RFC PATCH 00/18] NBD protocol additions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, nbd-general@lists.sourceforge.net On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 04:05:40PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > This series is for qemu 2.7, and will probably need some rework > especially since some of it is trying to implement features > that are still marked experimental in upstream NBD. > > Included are some interoperability bug fixes, code cleanups, then > added support both client-side and server-side for: > NBD_FLAG_C_NO_ZEROES > NBD_CMD_WRITE_ZEROES > NBD_CMD_CLOSE Please hold off with the CLOSE implementation until the discussion on that has finalized. (not commenting on the rest of your series, since that's mostly qemu-specific) -- < ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules, and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too. -- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12