From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Gabriel L . Somlo" <somlo@cmu.edu>,
Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] fw_cfg: RFQDN rules, documentation
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:31:21 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160411142509-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8760voo18x.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org>
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:04:14PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> My best guess
> is you're referring to the part where I challenge mapping
> /unsupported/root/FOO to FOO. I find that baroque. I can accept
> baroque when I see a reason. That's why I asked for it. "I got ACKs
> for it" is not a particular satisfying reason, but I figure you got
> another one. Do tell :)
The issue I am trying to address is that users can put stuff
outside "opt/" without realizing they are violating any rules.
I do not think printing a warning is sufficient for this:
it is masked by tools too often.
Thus, anything outside "opt/" must be forbidden and cause a failure.
Gerd and others asked for a way to bypass this "for development"
which presumably means they way a quick way to develop guest
code interacting with QEMU without changing qemu proper,
with the intent to merge support into QEMU a bit later.
We could add a special flag for this instead but the mapping
is a couple of lines of code, so seems easier,
the point is to have "unsupported" there.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-11 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-08 7:54 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] fw_cfg: RFQDN rules, documentation Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-08 16:31 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-04-09 17:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-11 11:04 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-04-11 11:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2016-04-13 8:59 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-04-13 11:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-13 16:17 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-04-13 17:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-14 7:36 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-04-14 8:10 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-14 11:28 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-04-13 14:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-13 16:19 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-04-13 17:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-14 7:39 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-04-14 8:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-14 11:29 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-04-14 12:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-15 15:39 ` Markus Armbruster
2016-04-17 6:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-04-18 16:42 ` Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160411142509-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=somlo@cmu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).