From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37615) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqLg3-0001M2-Go for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:21:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqLg2-0005By-IV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:21:55 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 15:21:41 +0100 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Message-ID: <20160413142141.GF8847@redhat.com> Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" References: <1460473063-18305-1-git-send-email-ptoscano@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1460473063-18305-1-git-send-email-ptoscano@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] iSCSI: start moving options also for -drive List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Pino Toscano Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, kwolf@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, pl@kamp.de, ronniesahlberg@gmail.com On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 04:57:42PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > Hi, > > to overcome the limitations of the options handling [1], I'm planning > to move more options for iSCSI also as block options, so it is possible > to specify them with -drive. > > The only patch in this series is for initiator-target, as I want to be > sure the approach is correct, and wanted. I think the approach makes sense - the current -iscsi arg is utter madness as a concept, so the sooner everything is allowed via -drive the better Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|