From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58947)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <amit.shah@redhat.com>) id 1asPJo-0004b6-VA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 02:39:29 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <amit.shah@redhat.com>) id 1asPJl-0003B9-IH
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 02:39:28 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35485)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <amit.shah@redhat.com>) id 1asPJl-0003B5-DM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 02:39:25 -0400
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:09:21 +0530
From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20160419063921.GA4735@grmbl.mre>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Move autoconverge out of experimental?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, qemu list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Hi Jason,

We've had the new autoconverge features enabled for a full release
now, what are your thoughts on dropping the x- ?

Some factors I consider are direct user feedback, changes to the
functionality / API, and higher-level user feedback (like libvirt).  I
believe libvirt is now using the new options, and they've not
complained.  So we could be ready to drop the x- prefix.

Thoughts?

		Amit