* [Qemu-devel] Move autoconverge out of experimental?
@ 2016-04-19 6:39 Amit Shah
2016-04-19 13:28 ` Jason J. Herne
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Amit Shah @ 2016-04-19 6:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jjherne
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert, Juan Quintela, Jiri Denemark, Eric Blake,
qemu list
Hi Jason,
We've had the new autoconverge features enabled for a full release
now, what are your thoughts on dropping the x- ?
Some factors I consider are direct user feedback, changes to the
functionality / API, and higher-level user feedback (like libvirt). I
believe libvirt is now using the new options, and they've not
complained. So we could be ready to drop the x- prefix.
Thoughts?
Amit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Move autoconverge out of experimental?
2016-04-19 6:39 [Qemu-devel] Move autoconverge out of experimental? Amit Shah
@ 2016-04-19 13:28 ` Jason J. Herne
2016-04-20 3:55 ` Amit Shah
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason J. Herne @ 2016-04-19 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Amit Shah
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert, Juan Quintela, Jiri Denemark, Eric Blake,
qemu list
On 04/19/2016 02:39 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> We've had the new autoconverge features enabled for a full release
> now, what are your thoughts on dropping the x- ?
>
> Some factors I consider are direct user feedback, changes to the
> functionality / API, and higher-level user feedback (like libvirt). I
> believe libvirt is now using the new options, and they've not
> complained. So we could be ready to drop the x- prefix.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Amit
>
Hi Amit,
Yes, I agree with you. We can probably drop the x-. The new autoconverge
behavior was actually "in place" for the entire release. It was only the
new commands to adjust throttling parameters that were marked as
experimental. It is great that no one found any bugs. Let's hope it
stays that way :)
--
-- Jason J. Herne (jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Move autoconverge out of experimental?
2016-04-19 13:28 ` Jason J. Herne
@ 2016-04-20 3:55 ` Amit Shah
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Amit Shah @ 2016-04-20 3:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason J. Herne
Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert, Juan Quintela, Jiri Denemark, Eric Blake,
qemu list
On (Tue) 19 Apr 2016 [09:28:34], Jason J. Herne wrote:
> On 04/19/2016 02:39 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> >Hi Jason,
> >
> >We've had the new autoconverge features enabled for a full release
> >now, what are your thoughts on dropping the x- ?
> >
> >Some factors I consider are direct user feedback, changes to the
> >functionality / API, and higher-level user feedback (like libvirt). I
> >believe libvirt is now using the new options, and they've not
> >complained. So we could be ready to drop the x- prefix.
> >
> >Thoughts?
> >
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> Yes, I agree with you. We can probably drop the x-. The new autoconverge
> behavior was actually "in place" for the entire release. It was only the new
> commands to adjust throttling parameters that were marked as experimental.
> It is great that no one found any bugs. Let's hope it stays that way :)
OK - can you send a patch? It'll be a 2.7 patch, though.
Our QE team also recently started testing the new autoconverge, so if
there's anything in there, it would be known soon :-)
Thanks,
Amit
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-20 3:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-04-19 6:39 [Qemu-devel] Move autoconverge out of experimental? Amit Shah
2016-04-19 13:28 ` Jason J. Herne
2016-04-20 3:55 ` Amit Shah
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).