From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51935)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <amit.shah@redhat.com>) id 1asjEv-0005RT-NP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 23:55:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <amit.shah@redhat.com>) id 1asjEr-0004aa-Lq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 23:55:45 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49038)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <amit.shah@redhat.com>) id 1asjEr-0004aW-GW
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 23:55:41 -0400
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:25:38 +0530
From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20160420035538.GB4735@grmbl.mre>
References: <20160419063921.GA4735@grmbl.mre>
	<57163282.3040801@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <57163282.3040801@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Move autoconverge out of experimental?
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>, Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>, Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>, qemu list <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On (Tue) 19 Apr 2016 [09:28:34], Jason J. Herne wrote:
> On 04/19/2016 02:39 AM, Amit Shah wrote:
> >Hi Jason,
> >
> >We've had the new autoconverge features enabled for a full release
> >now, what are your thoughts on dropping the x- ?
> >
> >Some factors I consider are direct user feedback, changes to the
> >functionality / API, and higher-level user feedback (like libvirt).  I
> >believe libvirt is now using the new options, and they've not
> >complained.  So we could be ready to drop the x- prefix.
> >
> >Thoughts?
> >
> 
> Hi Amit,
> 
> Yes, I agree with you. We can probably drop the x-. The new autoconverge
> behavior was actually "in place" for the entire release. It was only the new
> commands to adjust throttling parameters that were marked as experimental.
> It is great that no one found any bugs. Let's hope it stays that way :)

OK - can you send a patch?  It'll be a 2.7 patch, though.

Our QE team also recently started testing the new autoconverge, so if
there's anything in there, it would be known soon :-)

Thanks,

		Amit